On Wed, 14 Oct 2009, Sam Vekemans wrote:
> eye... i, i ie :0)
>
> But of course the landuse us 'unknown' by default. .. so what needs to be
> done is to go around and find out what the actual landuse is.
> ... of course there are voids there are voids all over the map of black
> space. :)
Sam,
Hello,
highway=raceway has recently been added to the Map Features page because
it had been added to the Mapnik rendering rules a few months earlier,
but there is no information available about the tag.
Could someone who knows the details create a wiki page for it? Is it
intended for motorcar
2009/10/14 Ulf Möller :
> Hello,
>
> highway=raceway has recently been added to the Map Features page because
> it had been added to the Mapnik rendering rules a few months earlier,
> but there is no information available about the tag.
>
> Could someone who knows the details create a wiki page for
John Smith schrieb:
> 2009/10/14 Ulf Möller :
>> Hello,
>>
>> highway=raceway has recently been added to the Map Features page because
>> it had been added to the Mapnik rendering rules a few months earlier,
>> but there is no information available about the tag.
>>
>> Could someone who knows the d
2009/10/14 Gilles Corlobé :
>> Joseph
> In my opinion, the tag "landuse=military" should only be used for specificly
> military activities, like those discribed in the wiki.
> Some of you have suggested to create 2 areas, covering the same place. I
> don't think this is correct. One of you said tha
John Smith wrote:
> I assume it's for vehicles, as the map features list horse racing and
> sports as leisure=track, sport=*
>
I think it's for all types: motor,horse, dog, snails etc.
I see leisure=track, sport=* as the area of the whole site whilst
highway=raceway is the actual track that th
2009/10/14 Dave F. :
> John Smith wrote:
>> I assume it's for vehicles, as the map features list horse racing and
>> sports as leisure=track, sport=*
>>
> I think it's for all types: motor,horse, dog, snails etc.
>
> I see leisure=track, sport=* as the area of the whole site whilst
> highway=racewa
John Smith wrote:
> 2009/10/14 Dave F. :
>
>> John Smith wrote:
>>
>>> I assume it's for vehicles, as the map features list horse racing and
>>> sports as leisure=track, sport=*
>>>
>>>
>> I think it's for all types: motor,horse, dog, snails etc.
>>
>> I see leisure=track, sport=* as
2009/10/14 Dave F. :
> Advocating what? The naming or the fact I see it as two entities?
Two very similarly named tags that don't seem to be distinct enough
unless you read the wiki, if that's what it comes down to.
> There definitely needs to be a distinction in the tagging to allow for
> differ
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 10:59 PM, Anthony wrote:
> I've done some tagging of some different methods of tagging strip
> malls under the current (and slightly extended) Karlsruhe Schema.
> Unfortunately, Mapnik hasn't gotten around to rendering all the tiles
> yet, so I'll wait until later to reveal
Because it is likely to be useful to my local authority in a real world
project, I am considering adding some tags to schools to classify them,
something like this:
operator=Somewhereshire County Council
school:level=early|first|nursery|infant|junior|primary|prep|secondary|tertiary|special|refer
Thanks for creating a comprehensive sample map.For the case of mapping
this type of multi-tenant building, I would be comfortable with either of
the middle case tagging formats as being both easy to create, maintain, and
useful for navigation.
>The ways just north and south of the right sid
(Sorry to break the thread, I'm just subscribed and wanted to give a thought
on the "not overlapping landuse, and multipolygon model advantages and
drawbacks" )
Emilie said :
> Landuse should be exclusive by definition. As
> someone pointed out before in a separate message, this is trying to be
I think I'd prefer school:type rather than school:status, and I'd prpbably
separate out the denominations to another tag. And please avoid that mess of
underscores in c_of_e - a recipe for typos if ever I saw one.
Richard
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 8:30 PM, David Earl wrote:
> Because it is likely
I think the operator tag needs some careful documentation if you're
going to use it this way.
Take this local (to me) school as an example
www.stjosephsbrackenridge.qld.edu.au I'll be mapping it's area soon.
This is a Catholic Primary School. If I used operator tag, I'd put
Catholic Church or si
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> actually I think that instead of discussing interpolation with
> regularlyskipped numbers you could map explicitly the nodes of the
> real numbers, thus getting a high-precision map instead of this
> interpolation-crab, that is much less useful then an actual accurate
Randy Thomson wrote:
> Sounds good Martin. I have about 3000-5000 houses to tag, I'll tag the
> beginning and ending house addresses, on each street, if you'll tag
> the 15-20 individual houses in between. They're in the satellite
> images, so it shouldn't be a problem.
>
Oops, don't want to get
17 matches
Mail list logo
