> the tag
> is used directly (e.g. destination=Exampletown) on the ways leading away
> from a bifurcation, and/or in the form of destination:lanes (e.g.
> destination:lanes=Exampletown|
> Foobarcity) on the way leading towards the
> bifurcation.
Thanks for this explication! I was always in doubt
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 6:55 PM, Tobias Knerr wrote:
> On 29.08.2014 21:16, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > Destinations are supposed to be relations, and the members are pretty
> > clear.
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:destination_sign#Members
>
> I believe Kristen was talking about Key:d
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 6:46 PM, Johan C wrote:
> For motorways it's not necessary to know the location of the signposts,
> since every split is signposted (except for some very few exceptions
> maybe).
>
There have been some rather notorious examples where this has not always
been the case. The
On 29.08.2014 21:16, Paul Johnson wrote:
> Destinations are supposed to be relations, and the members are pretty
> clear. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:destination_sign#Members
I believe Kristen was talking about Key:destination, which is what
should replace exit_to. There are no re
I'm using the motorway_junction node on exits, with the ref and the name as
tags. Reasons: it has been done since the early days of OSM, and it looks
nice on Mapnik. I'm also using the motorway_junction up to four times per
interchange to have the name of the interchange appear on Mapnik (example:
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 12:26 PM, Kam, Kristen wrote:
> For a while now, the status quo was to use the 'exit_to' tag on the node
> where the signpost would be (bifurcation points typically) when
> representing a signpost location and information. This tag is being
> deprecated (hence this wiki p