On 07/08/2014 16:53, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
"culvert" isn't a bridge type at all (in my understanding),
(on the other part of this)
I'd agree that "culvert" isn't a type of bridge. I think that some of
the confusion in OSM came from someone finding an old American drawing
of a car dri
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 09:12:07AM +0200, Martin Vonwald wrote:
> Hi!
>
> 2014-08-12 22:57 GMT+02:00 Richard Z. :
>
> > what else can I do?
> >
>
> Maybe it's time to open up a change request for the main map style? The tag
> man_made=bridge seems to be used worldwide [1] in some - more or less
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 09:25:33AM -0300, John Packer wrote:
> > Just noticed that some mappers resort to adding building=yes or similar to
> > make it render at all.
>
> Note that bridges that are buildings actually exist. [1]
>
> But adding building=* to a bridge when it's not the case would be
> Just noticed that some mappers resort to adding building=yes or similar to
> make it render at all.
Note that bridges that are buildings actually exist. [1]
But adding building=* to a bridge when it's not the case would be "tagging
(incorrectly) for the renderer".
[1]: http://wiki.openstreetma
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 09:12:07AM +0200, Martin Vonwald wrote:
> Hi!
>
> 2014-08-12 22:57 GMT+02:00 Richard Z. :
>
> > what else can I do?
> >
>
> Maybe it's time to open up a change request for the main map style? The tag
> man_made=bridge seems to be used worldwide [1] in some - more or less
> Il giorno 12/ago/2014, alle ore 11:26, "Richard Z." ha
> scritto:
>
> There were
> quite some odd cases, like bridge=drawbridge used to "draw" the outline of
> the bridge.
I don't think that's "odd" but rather the preferable method to map a bridge (as
opposed to map that a piece of way i
> Il giorno 12/ago/2014, alle ore 14:02, John Packer
> ha scritto:
>
> I believe it's main purpose is to solve a known rendering problem in bridges.
this is not at all limited to rendering, it is a question how to map a bridge -
as long as we don't map it (but only imply it by tagging that
Hi!
2014-08-12 22:57 GMT+02:00 Richard Z. :
> what else can I do?
>
Maybe it's time to open up a change request for the main map style? The tag
man_made=bridge seems to be used worldwide [1] in some - more or less -
consistent way. It provides useful data, is simple to tag, it should be
easy to
another lamentable attempt is here:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/241772803
what else can I do?
Richard
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 09:06:02AM -0300, John Packer wrote:
> PS: If you removed these 'bridges as area', you probably should fix that.
>
>
> 2014-08-12 9:02 GMT-03:00 John Packer :
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 09:06:02AM -0300, John Packer wrote:
> PS: If you removed these 'bridges as area', you probably should fix that.
I have removed the area around this one:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25397414
and filed this ticket as it did not render sanely:
https://github.com/gra
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 09:02:39AM -0300, John Packer wrote:
> Richard,
> Perhaps these cases in which the outline of the bridge was drawn is related
> to this proposal:
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/man_made%3Dbridge
yes, I am pretty sure it was a desperate attempt to mak
PS: If you removed these 'bridges as area', you probably should fix that.
2014-08-12 9:02 GMT-03:00 John Packer :
> Richard,
> Perhaps these cases in which the outline of the bridge was drawn is
> related to this proposal:
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/man_made%3Dbridge
Richard,
Perhaps these cases in which the outline of the bridge was drawn is related
to this proposal:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/man_made%3Dbridge
I believe it's main purpose is to solve a known rendering problem in
bridges.
Nowadays, when two or more parallel ways are i
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 12:23:35AM -0400, Christopher Hoess wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 7:57 PM, SomeoneElse
> wrote:
>
> > For the benefit of anyone looking at taginfo stats in this thread, it's
> > worth mentioning that there's some "non-survey-based" editing going on:
> >
> > http://www.o
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 7:57 PM, SomeoneElse
wrote:
> For the benefit of anyone looking at taginfo stats in this thread, it's
> worth mentioning that there's some "non-survey-based" editing going on:
>
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/24690099
>
>
All "bridge=drawbridge" to "bridge=movabl
For the benefit of anyone looking at taginfo stats in this thread, it's
worth mentioning that there's some "non-survey-based" editing going on:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/24690099
Cheers,
Andu
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreet
On Sat, Aug 09, 2014 at 09:21:46AM -0400, Christopher Hoess wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 8:25 AM, Richard Z. wrote:
> >
> >
> > thanks, that looks much better now.
> >
> > Would it be fine to add the "simple_suspension" type
> >(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simple_suspension_bridge)
> > to
On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 8:25 AM, Richard Z. wrote:
>
>
> thanks, that looks much better now.
>
> Would it be fine to add the "simple_suspension" type
>(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simple_suspension_bridge)
> to http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bridge:structure ? It appears
> that most of
On Fri, Aug 08, 2014 at 05:10:26PM -0400, Christopher Hoess wrote:
> Volker,
>
> There was a rather inconspicuous sentence at the end of
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bridge linking to the additional
> "bridge:..." keys. I've reordered the introductory material in that page
> somewhat t
Volker,
There was a rather inconspicuous sentence at the end of
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bridge linking to the additional
"bridge:..." keys. I've reordered the introductory material in that page
somewhat to make it more clear that these additional options exist for
adding detail abou
agreed
That means producing a revised bridge wiki page that combines all info.
Who does the work?
:-(
On 8 August 2014 13:07, Tobias Knerr wrote:
> On 08.08.2014 11:35, Richard Z. wrote:
> > My idea was
> > * abandon bridge=swing in favor of bridge=movable which could provide
> > subtyping
On 08.08.2014 11:35, Richard Z. wrote:
> My idea was
> * abandon bridge=swing in favor of bridge=movable which could provide
> subtyping if someone really needed it.
We already have an approved proposal that provides this subtyping:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Bridge_t
> Am 08/ago/2014 um 11:35 schrieb "Richard Z." :
>
> My idea was
> * abandon bridge=swing in favor of bridge=movable which could provide
> subtyping if someone really needed it.
> * introduce bridge=suspension bridge=simple_suspension
I suggest to also look at previous discussions on this t
On Thu, Aug 07, 2014 at 05:58:01PM +0200, Volker Schmidt wrote:
> Good old Wiipedia helps:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bridge#Types_of_bridges
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swing_bridge
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suspension_bridge
wikipedia is clear on that but if you look at "swing
On 7 August 2014 18:35, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
> yes, aqueducts will usually also have bridges as parts of them (not all,
> some even run underground for instance).
>
Not true. In California the aqueducts look like navigable canals, but carry
drinking water.
> Still this is a completely d
2014-08-07 19:06 GMT+02:00 Philip Barnes :
> An aqueduct is definitely a type of bridge, i.e. one carrying a
> waterway, usually a canal over a road, river or valley.
>
> The most famous, and scariest of them all
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pontcysyllte_Aqueduct
>
yes, aqueducts will usuall
Yes. That is a navigable aqueduct bridge.
It is a structurally a viaduct with an aqueduct function on top. So how to
map these two orthogonal properties of this bridge? I would map this as
waterway=canal, bridge=viaduct, boat=yes, layer=x exactly as we do for a
road bridge. If you want you can add
On Thu, 2014-08-07 at 17:53 +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
> 2014-08-07 17:25 GMT+02:00 Richard Z. :
>
> Wondering what to do with that? With just 687 objects
> worldwide the problem
> would be easily fixable.. just how?
>
>
> I think tagging the type of bri
Good old Wiipedia helps:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bridge#Types_of_bridges
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swing_bridge
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suspension_bridge
On 7 August 2014 17:25, Richard Z. wrote:
>
> Those are radically different types of bridges.. comparing
>http://www.trav
2014-08-07 17:25 GMT+02:00 Richard Z. :
>
> Wondering what to do with that? With just 687 objects worldwide the problem
> would be easily fixable.. just how?
I think tagging the type of bridge as road attribute might be an
exxageration. We should start mapping bridges as objects (area) and then
30 matches
Mail list logo
