2018-05-11 14:04 GMT+01:00 Martin Koppenhoefer :
> sent from a phone
>
> > On 11. May 2018, at 14:35, Javier Sánchez Portero
> wrote:
> >
> > similar for the other two streets. With the proposed relation, I would
> create a relation with this tags
> >
> > type=address
> > addr:housenumber=1-25
>
sent from a phone
> On 11. May 2018, at 14:35, Javier Sánchez Portero
> wrote:
>
> similar for the other two streets. With the proposed relation, I would create
> a relation with this tags
>
> type=address
> addr:housenumber=1-25
> addr:postcode=10018
> addr:street=West 33rd Street
I woul
2018-05-11 10:53 GMT+01:00 Martin Koppenhoefer :
> May be it would be good to have a relation to keep in only one place an
>> address and link there the affected elements: entrances, buildings, POI's
>> and area for this address. This would be necessary only for some cases like
>> a building with
2018-05-11 10:40 GMT+02:00 Javier Sánchez Portero :
> In Spain, there isn't a relation one-to-one between entrances and
> addresses, but it's pretty common to have a building with more than one
> address. They may be a building with access from different streets or a
> building (maybe with a house
2018-05-09 22:41 GMT+01:00 Martin Koppenhoefer :
> Is there a way to indicate a housenumber is a feature, vs. a property?
>
> In many places, housenumbers refer to buildings or sites, and you might
> omit addresses on contained features (because you can hope for inheritance
> from the containing a
I was recently on holiday in Turin, where addresses are mapped as POIs inside
the buildings; a few have been fleshed out as businesses but many shops remain
unmapped. I was once able to identify which node to fill out but the others
were going to take more time than I was willing to spend.
--
