I was trying to avoid tag proliferation and, since the two share features, I
thought it would be useful if an animal sanctuary tag can reuse tags from
animal_shelter, to make it more meaningful.
But either way is fine for me. I was wondering if others have opinions on this.
Nicolas Maia
--
S
On Tue, 20 Nov 2018 at 18:35, Nicolas Maia wrote:
>
> So I propose to extend animal_shelter:purpose= to allow the value
> "sanctuary", which ideally should be coupled with "animal_shelter:release=no".
As you wrote, animal sanctuaries aren't animal shelters, so why not
tagging them amenity=animal
