I was trying to avoid tag proliferation and, since the two share features, I thought it would be useful if an animal sanctuary tag can reuse tags from animal_shelter, to make it more meaningful.
But either way is fine for me. I was wondering if others have opinions on this. Nicolas Maia -- Securely sent with Tutanota. Claim your encrypted mailbox today! https://tutanota.com 20 de nov de 2018 16:26 por selfishseaho...@gmail.com: > On Tue, 20 Nov 2018 at 18:35, Nicolas Maia <> nicolasrpm...@tutanota.com > <mailto:nicolasrpm...@tutanota.com>> > wrote: > >> >> So I propose to extend animal_shelter:purpose= to allow the value >> "sanctuary", which ideally should be coupled with >> "animal_shelter:release=no". >> > > As you wrote, animal sanctuaries aren't animal shelters, so why not > tagging them amenity=animal_sanctuary instead? This seems simpler and > clearer to me. > > Regards > Markus > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging> >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
