On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 5:02 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
> it depends how you use the word "Doppelhaus". Legally it means 2 touching
> houses on 2 parcels. Architectonically it means 2 more or less symmetric
> buildings that touch. They don't have to share the same materials or
> colours (mos
Am 17.09.2015 um 16:29 schrieb Ruben Maes
:
building:type=semidetached_house,
unlike what I wrote before, the correct tags seem to be, if one
wants to tag what is already in geometry:
building=house
building:type=semidetached
sent from a phone
> Am 18.09.2015 um 10:20 schrieb Ruben Maes :
>
> Doppelhäuser which is not exactly the same as just two houses that share a
> wall, right?
it depends how you use the word "Doppelhaus". Legally it means 2 touching
houses on 2 parcels. Architectonically it means 2 more or l
sent from a phone
> Am 18.09.2015 um 09:47 schrieb Frederik Ramm :
>
> I'd say the same applies to houses. Whether something is one half of a
> double house, or semi-detached, or terraced, or free-standing - isn't
> that something that I can automatically determine by looking at the
> nearby ma
sent from a phone
> Am 18.09.2015 um 10:00 schrieb Ruben Maes :
>
> None of those values are OK, but iD wants us to embrace semidetached_house?
I believe to recall that this value was discussed at least on the German
mailing list, I don't perceive it as pushed by iD.
cheers
Martin
__
On 18/09/2015, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> I'd say the same applies to houses. Whether something is one half of a
> double house, or semi-detached, or terraced, or free-standing - isn't
> that something that I can automatically determine by looking at the
> nearby mapped buildings?
+1 I've always tagg
Friday 18 September 2015 09:47:12, Frederik Ramm:
> When someone adds copious "is_in" tags to things, or when they create
> relations like "all cycleways in Cambridge", we tell them: Don't bother
> doing that, we use a spatial database, and we can compute these things
> from the data.
>
> I'd say
Thursday 17 September 2015 16:48:48, Martin Koppenhoefer:
>
> sent from a phone
>
> > Am 17.09.2015 um 16:29 schrieb Ruben Maes :
> >
> > building:type=semidetached_house,
>
> is ok for me. We should write a definition into the wiki, thank you for
> preparing a proposal.
>
> > building:type=d
Hi,
On 09/18/2015 07:33 AM, Colin Smale wrote:
> Can we assume the houses at the ends of terraces are to be tagged as
> semi detached? This needs a bit more thinking through...
When someone adds copious "is_in" tags to things, or when they create
relations like "all cycleways in Cambridge", we te
sent from a phone
> Am 18.09.2015 um 07:33 schrieb Colin Smale :
>
> Can we assume the houses at the ends of terraces are to be tagged as semi
> detached?
My dictionary believes those are called "end-terrace_house" (in German
"Reihenendhaus"), while the semidetached house in German would b
Can we assume the houses at the ends of terraces are to be tagged as semi
detached? This needs a bit more thinking through...
On 17 September 2015 16:48:48 CEST, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>
>
>sent from a phone
>
>> Am 17.09.2015 um 16:29 schrieb Ruben Maes :
>>
>> building:type=semidetached_
On 2015-09-17 16:29, Ruben Maes wrote :
> Hi all Yesterday iD got a new preset: building=semidetached_house.
> https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/2776
I don't see *at all* why such a tag would be needed as it's perfectly
obvious from the topology that the building is semidetached and as it
sent from a phone
> Am 17.09.2015 um 16:29 schrieb Ruben Maes :
>
> building:type=semidetached_house,
is ok for me. We should write a definition into the wiki, thank you for
preparing a proposal.
> building:type=dwelling_house,
is this a house where someone is living? I prefer the values
13 matches
Mail list logo
