Re: [Tagging] RFC Reception_desk Mk2

2015-05-21 Thread pmailkeey .
On 21 May 2015 at 10:41, Kotya Karapetyan wrote: > > > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 12:34 AM, pmailkeey . > wrote: > >> If they need a map to find the place, the need any reception for newbies. >> Tag the appropriate entrances with ent/ext tags - all those entrances >> suitable for newbies. >> > > >

Re: [Tagging] RFC Reception_desk Mk2

2015-05-21 Thread Kotya Karapetyan
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 12:34 AM, pmailkeey . wrote: > If they need a map to find the place, the need any reception for newbies. > Tag the appropriate entrances with ent/ext tags - all those entrances > suitable for newbies. > I believe we should simply map the reality. So a reception should be

Re: [Tagging] RFC Reception_desk Mk2

2015-05-20 Thread pmailkeey .
On 20 May 2015 at 14:42, Kotya Karapetyan wrote: > One node, all tags is the gut feeling I get. Put all the tags on one and >> if two are the same key with different values, add the values separated by >> semicolons. >> >> If in doubt, create two nodes and use iD to combine them ;) by (shift) >>

Re: [Tagging] RFC Reception_desk Mk2

2015-05-20 Thread David Bannon
On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 11:09 +1000, Warin wrote: > Link to the proposal = > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_Features/amenity% > 3Dreception_desk > I still see this as a useful thing. David > For those not familiar with the proposal. > A Reception Desk provides a place where people (

Re: [Tagging] RFC Reception_desk Mk2

2015-05-20 Thread Kotya Karapetyan
> > One node, all tags is the gut feeling I get. Put all the tags on one and > if two are the same key with different values, add the values separated by > semicolons. > > If in doubt, create two nodes and use iD to combine them ;) by (shift) > selecting both and use the + symbol to combine. > > +1

Re: [Tagging] RFC Reception_desk Mk2

2015-05-20 Thread pmailkeey .
On 20 May 2015 at 02:09, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I have left this for a while. But I don't see it going anywhere in terms of > the tag=value. > The initial proposal started on 6 February 2015, has been voted on and > reformatted to address issues raised. > > Link to the p