Re: [Tagging] Power proposals

2013-03-14 Thread François Lacombe
Hi Phil, 2013/3/14 Phil! Gold > > In Maryland, the Dickerson Generating Station, which is privately owned > and uses coal and oil is directly adjacent to the Montgomery County > Resource Facility, which is owned by the state and burns trash. > > OSM: > http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=39.20497

Re: [Tagging] Power proposals

2013-03-14 Thread Phil! Gold
* François Lacombe [2013-03-14 18:52 +0100]: > Foremost, areas must reflect land occupation. If 2 different operators' > plants are contiguous in reality then areas must be contiguous too. > > Do you have any example which can illustrate such situation in the wiki? I know of a couple. In Maryl

Re: [Tagging] Power proposals

2013-03-14 Thread François Lacombe
Good question. It may be up to each mapper to make the distinction. Myself I would definitely use operators distinguishing : If a whole big plant is divided between two or more operators, I would map a separate area for each operator. Foremost, areas must reflect land occupation. If 2 different o

Re: [Tagging] Power proposals

2013-03-14 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
Could you explain when we should map several adjacent plants, and when they would be considered one big power plant consisting of several parts? How can the distinction be made? Does the area have to be contiguous? cheers, Martin ___ Tagging mailing lis