Hi Martin, hi Tobias,
I can see the merit of both the "conveying:lanes" proposal, and e.g. this
page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_Indoor_Tagging states that:
"Mapping of objects in OSM works best when there is no upfront requirement
to immediately add everything in great detail."
How
sent from a phone
> Il giorno 02 lug 2016, alle ore 12:23, Bjoern Hassler
> ha scritto:
>
> Do you know how conveying:lanes is rendered e.g. in osm online, osmand, etc?
it doesn't matter for mapping what is commonly understood/interpreted now,
because they will take care of it in the futur
sent from a phone
> Il giorno 02 lug 2016, alle ore 11:59, Tobias Knerr ha
> scritto:
>
> I hope this makes it clearer what I'm suggesting.
and now with 1 landing in the central steps please, and step_count. How can we
avoid the impression that there are now 6 escalators rather than 2?
An
sent from a phone
> Il giorno 02 lug 2016, alle ore 07:58, Tobias Knerr ha
> scritto:
>
> I think that doing it that way has significant benefits for rendering (i.e.
> avoid the inevitable overlapping ways and gaps), and the approach might be
> extended to other highway=step attributes wher
Hi Tobias,
Thanks!
Would you also set conveying=yes? I assume logically one would not.
However, this means that a renderer that doesn't understand
"conveying:lanes" renders the way as steps, meaning that people with
luggage or difficulty walking may not find it. Thus it may be better to set
conv
Hi Bjoern,
On 02.07.2016 10:14, Bjoern Hassler wrote:
Would you be able to give me an example for the use of the tag?
Say for steps running in parallel with two escalators (running up/down)?
you didn't mention the exact arrangement of the escalators, so I'm going
to assume two escalators (on
Hi Tobias,
Would you be able to give me an example for the use of the tag?
Say for steps running in parallel with two escalators (running up/down)?
Thanks,
Bjoern
On 2 Jul 2016 07:00, "Tobias Knerr" wrote:
> On 01.07.2016 20:02, Michael Reichert wrote:
>
>> Am 01.07.2016 um 19:30 schrieb Bjoer
On 01.07.2016 20:02, Michael Reichert wrote:
Am 01.07.2016 um 19:30 schrieb Bjoern Hassler:
Yes, you draw to parallel ways. One way gets conveying=yes, the other
one not (or conveying=no).
As the co-author of the conveying proposal, I'd like to offer an
alternative here. The proposal already m
Hi Bjoern,
Am 01.07.2016 um 19:30 schrieb Bjoern Hassler:
> A few questions about steps/escalators:
>
> (1) Should an escalator always have "highway=steps"? I.e.
> highway=steps
> conveying=yes
> (see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:conveying ).
Yes. An escalator can be used as a steps ev
sent from a phone
> Il giorno 01 lug 2016, alle ore 19:30, Bjoern Hassler
> ha scritto:
>
> (2) How would I tag steps that run in parallel to an escalator? Can this be
> done with one way only?
no
> If so how? Or would I need two ways? In my opinion it would be best to do it
> with one
Hello all,
A few questions about steps/escalators:
(1) Should an escalator always have "highway=steps"? I.e.
highway=steps
conveying=yes
(see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:conveying ).
(2) How would I tag steps that run in parallel to an escalator? Can this be
done with one way only? If
11 matches
Mail list logo
