Hi Tobias, Thanks!
Would you also set conveying=yes? I assume logically one would not. However, this means that a renderer that doesn't understand "conveying:lanes" renders the way as steps, meaning that people with luggage or difficulty walking may not find it. Thus it may be better to set conveying=yes in addition? Of course, some people may prefer stairs. Do you know how conveying:lanes is rendered e.g. in osm online, osmand, etc? Thanks, Bjoern On 2 Jul 2016 11:01, "Tobias Knerr" <o...@tobias-knerr.de> wrote: > Hi Bjoern, > > On 02.07.2016 10:14, Bjoern Hassler wrote: > >> Would you be able to give me an example for the use of the tag? >> >> Say for steps running in parallel with two escalators (running up/down)? >> > > you didn't mention the exact arrangement of the escalators, so I'm going > to assume two escalators (one up, one down) with normal steps in between. > This example would be tagged as: > > highway=steps + conveying:lanes=forward|no|backward > > Basically, you have 3 parallel "stripes": > * The first is an escalator moving the same direction as the OSM way. > * The second is normal steps (not an escalator). > * The third is an escalator moving opposite the OSM way. > > I hope this makes it clearer what I'm suggesting. > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
