I think places like these event venues with already fixed facilities on the
area can be fitted in the event place proposal, but these can sound like
amenities or leisures. There are places with no buildings used for
festivities that are more like landuses, though.
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 7:26 PM,
When I think of leisure=events, I think of facilities (that are not
convention centers) where you can hold social and corporate events such as
company parties, wedding receptions, small musical concerts, product
launchings and the like. Here in my country there are plenty of such
facilities and I'm
On 12 mars 2014 23:00:04 UTC+01:00, John Packer wrote:
>I think it should be either amenity=* or landuse=*.
>leisure=* sounds odd, since the place can be vacant most of the
>time(and
>not accessible during that time).
->This is an 'event'.
Yves
>
>
>2014-03-12 18:15 GMT-03:00 Martin Koppenhoe
I think it should be either amenity=* or landuse=*.
leisure=* sounds odd, since the place can be vacant most of the time(and
not accessible during that time).
2014-03-12 18:15 GMT-03:00 Martin Koppenhoefer :
>
> 2014-03-12 22:12 GMT+01:00 Antônio Marcos :
>
> But still is there any other key oth
2014-03-12 22:12 GMT+01:00 Antônio Marcos :
> But still is there any other key other than landuse or leisure that fits
> better with event_space?
for me leisure is OK, amenity would be fine as well.
Cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@ope
But still is there any other key other than landuse or leisure that fits
better with event_space?
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 6:08 PM, John Willis wrote:
>
> On Mar 13, 2014, at 5:32 AM, Antônio Marcos wrote:
>
> Are there any other keys that may contain the event area value? There may
> be buildi
> On Mar 13, 2014, at 5:32 AM, Antônio Marcos wrote:
>
> Are there any other keys that may contain the event area value? There may be
> buildings
>> I keep insisting that "events" is not a good choice as it is not
>> self-explaining, and it is not a description of the place itself but of wha
Leisure yes, landuse no.
On 12 mars 2014 20:21:23 UTC+01:00, "Antônio Marcos"
wrote:
>I am still struggling a bit about the key that should be used with the
>"events" value. Should I keep "leisure", as it is now, or change it to
>landuse? What are your opinions on this, please? Thanks for the he
Are there any other keys that may contain the event area value? There may
be buildings permanently installed on it or it may even contain nothing,
being just a reserved/symbolic use of the land, so it seems to fit in both
cases of landuse and leisure.
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 4:30 PM, Martin Koppe
2014-03-12 20:21 GMT+01:00 Antônio Marcos :
> I am still struggling a bit about the key that should be used with the
> "events" value. Should I keep "leisure", as it is now, or change it to
> landuse? What are your opinions on this, please?
IMHO there could be a landuse, but landuses hardly is
I am still struggling a bit about the key that should be used with the
"events" value. Should I keep "leisure", as it is now, or change it to
landuse? What are your opinions on this, please? Thanks for the help :).
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 9:06 PM, johnw wrote:
> >
> > IMHO we do indeed have no
>
> IMHO we do indeed have no need for building=public / civic.
if I were back in San Deigo, I might agree with that, but having come to Japan,
there is a definite and immediately recognizable distinction of city buildings,
*and* they are used quite heavily.
There is a known difference and a
I think areas used for temporary fairs would fit well in landuse=events.
The case of a permanent fairground seems to be just like an amusement park,
which can be just tagged as tourism=theme_park. What I want to keep clear
is that event areas are permanent places for events and are lands reserved
f
On Sun, 2014-03-09 at 20:49 +0100, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
> 2014-03-09 17:18 GMT+01:00 Antônio Marcos :
> I have created this proposal some time ago for a new tag
> called leisure=events (originally landuse=events), which
> should describe areas reserved for events in
Thanks for the support so far,
I think the leisure key doesn't fit good in the case, the event-destinated
area is not a place where people generally go during the year in their
spare time when there is no events, so it is a pretty specific land used
and reserved for events. Also, the leisure tag w
2014-03-10 12:48 GMT+01:00 johnw :
> otherwise we would have no need for building=civic / public.
IMHO we do indeed have no need for building=public / civic. Both can be
considered vague building types, but on a very generic level, I'd encourage
everyone to use more specific building tags. It i
Thanks for the quick reply Martin!
I always assumed "commercial" => company => private. Same with "industrial =>
industry, otherwise we would have no need for building=civic / public.
reading through what you wrote, it seem like most of my suggested civic
buildings would be landuse=commerical
ndication of what the land is used for.
Original Message
From: Martin Koppenhoefer
Sent: March 10, 2014 3:15:00 AM CDT
To: "daveswarth...@gmail.com" , "Tag discussion, strategy and
related tools"
Cc: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools"
ot; , "Tag discussion,
strategy and related tools"
Cc: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools"
Subject: Re: [Tagging] leisure=events
> Am 10/mar/2014 um 00:36 schrieb Dave Swarthout :
>
> landuse=civic
could you give some more examples what fits into this?
2014-03-10 10:52 GMT+01:00 johnw :
> Well, to me, landuse=civic it is the land that public owned, public
> accessed facilities that not covered by a specific existing landuse (works,
> water treatment plant, school, landfill, highways, railways).
>
IMHO we should not mix "specific" and "general"
+1 for leisure (not presuming any combination/overlapping with a landuse)
-1 for events (could be misused for any events, not for a dedicated place)
+1 for "event(s)_space", "event(s)_place", "event_whateveryoulike"
Pieren
___
Tagging mailing list
Taggi
Well, to me, landuse=civic it is the land that public owned, public accessed
facilities that not covered by a specific existing landuse (works, water
treatment plant, school, landfill, highways, railways).
In the built environment (not natural), there are some *general* landuses, such
as:
- 4
Am 10.03.2014 um 09:30 schrieb Peter Wendorff :
> And even other shared purpose concepts are pretty common for event
> spaces, I think:
> - Sometimes parks (most of the year leisure=park) are used for events
> regularly.
> - Many parking spaces (most of the year amenity=parking;
> parking=surfac
Am 10.03.2014 06:39, schrieb Yves:
> Many music festival take place on otherwise landuse=meadow
+1
And even other shared purpose concepts are pretty common for event
spaces, I think:
- Sometimes parks (most of the year leisure=park) are used for events
regularly.
- Many parking spaces (most of the
> Am 10/mar/2014 um 00:36 schrieb Dave Swarthout :
>
> landuse=civic
could you give some more examples what fits into this?
a public swimming pool? a courthouse? a library? a power station ? A wastewater
treatment plant? the homeland security vehicle depot? a museum? a church? the
federal m
Many music festival take place on otherwise landuse=meadow
On 9 mars 2014 22:41:51 UTC+01:00, jonathan wrote:
>I definitely think there is a need for this, I can think of many places
>
>around the UK this could apply to.
>
>landuse=events is better than leisure=*
>
>Jonathan
>
>http://bigfatfrog6
Thanks for the suggestions so far,
Martin, English is not my native, so in fact I haven't heard about
fairgrounds before :), but in the case I was referring to the value
fairgrounds, and I knew about it by searching at taginfo after you
mentioned it. There are some cases of "fairgrounds" being use
I like both of these:
landuse=events
landuse=civic
Regards,
Dave
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 4:41 AM, jonathan wrote:
> I definitely think there is a need for this, I can think of many places
> around the UK this could apply to.
>
> landuse=events is better than leisure=*
>
> Jonathan
>
> http:
I definitely think there is a need for this, I can think of many places
around the UK this could apply to.
landuse=events is better than leisure=*
Jonathan
http://bigfatfrog67.me
On 09/03/2014 21:31, Tod Fitch wrote:
It seems to me that landuse=events is reasonable. Most of the places
called
This ties into my idea for landuse=civic. There is no way to designate the land
use for city buildings, etc, except for narrowly defined ones, such as schools.
There are courthouses, community centers, public performance venues, and other
areas where the buildings have specific tags, but there i
It seems to me that landuse=events is reasonable. Most of the places called
fairgrounds where I am are used for other events other than the traditional
once a year fair. There are often swap meets, animal shows, concerts, and other
events held during the year. And the area often (always in my ex
> Am 09/mar/2014 um 22:04 schrieb Antônio Marcos :
>
> I've never heard of "fairground", but it seems to be a quite specific tag
> that could be substituted by or even inside the events area.
I understand fairground or maybe fair_grounds as word for the whole area,
including service areas lik
I've never heard of "fairground", but it seems to be a quite specific tag
that could be substituted by or even inside the events area. The events tag
is indeed supposed to be generic, just like landuse=retail, which demarks
areas used by shops, and the leisure or landuse key before the "events"
val
2014-03-09 17:18 GMT+01:00 Antônio Marcos :
> I have created this proposal some time ago for a new tag called
> leisure=events (originally landuse=events), which should describe areas
> reserved for events in a city or in a place (more info at the proposal page
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki
I have created this proposal some time ago for a new tag called
leisure=events (originally landuse=events), which should describe areas
reserved for events in a city or in a place (more info at the proposal page
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/leisure%3Devents). Does
anybody ha
35 matches
Mail list logo
