Re: [Tagging] extend unsigned to describe "no info on the ground" for a key

Le 03.07.19 à 17:36, Paul Allen a écrit : > On Wed, 3 Jul 2019 at 16:16, marc marc wrote: > Le 03.07.19 à 16:55, Paul Allen a écrit : >>> What "unsigned" doesn't do is identify how the mapper came >>> to any conclusion about the weight >>> limit or how other mappers may verify it. >> unsig

Re: [Tagging] extend unsigned to describe "no info on the ground" for a key

sent from a phone > On 3. Jul 2019, at 17:14, marc marc wrote: > > Similarly, when I > do a survey and I notice that a house does not have the usual sign > indicating its house number, I can said that the sign is not there. yes, and if they advertize their street address including “snc” it

Re: [Tagging] extend unsigned to describe "no info on the ground" for a key

On Wed, 3 Jul 2019 at 16:16, marc marc wrote: > Le 03.07.19 à 16:55, Paul Allen a écrit : > > What "unsigned" doesn't do is identify how the mapper came to any > > conclusion about the weight > > limit or how other mappers may verify it. > > unsigned just said "no info on the ground" > The same

Re: [Tagging] extend unsigned to describe "no info on the ground" for a key

Le 03.07.19 à 16:55, Paul Allen a écrit : > What "unsigned" doesn't do is identify how the mapper came to any > conclusion about the weight > limit or how other mappers may verify it. unsigned just said "no info on the ground" the panel may have fallen, stolen or not yet installed, the unsigned k

Re: [Tagging] extend unsigned to describe "no info on the ground" for a key

On Wed, 3 Jul 2019 at 14:56, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > "unsigned" means there is no sign on the ground, this would not avoid > noname=yes or nohousenumber=yes because they state there is no name or > housenumber, not that it isn't signed. > Surely "unsigned" means that the weights can only

Re: [Tagging] extend unsigned to describe "no info on the ground" for a key

Am Mi., 3. Juli 2019 um 15:48 Uhr schrieb marc marc < marc_marc_...@hotmail.com>: > Le 13.06.19 à 15:15, Tobias Zwick a écrit : > > it semantically refers to the <...> key > > it is a problem common to many keys but there is no overall coherence. > > extend unsigned used for name with unsigned= >

[Tagging] extend unsigned to describe "no info on the ground" for a key

Le 13.06.19 à 15:15, Tobias Zwick a écrit : > it semantically refers to the <...> key it is a problem common to many keys but there is no overall coherence. extend unsigned used for name with unsigned= is easy to make a link betweeen the key and "no info on the ground". it avoids: - using funny