Am Mi., 3. Juli 2019 um 15:48 Uhr schrieb marc marc < marc_marc_...@hotmail.com>:
> Le 13.06.19 à 15:15, Tobias Zwick a écrit : > > it semantically refers to the <...> key > > it is a problem common to many keys but there is no overall coherence. > > extend unsigned used for name with unsigned=<name of the key> > is easy to make a link betweeen the key and "no info on the ground". > > it avoids: > - using funny no*=yes > - namespaces without any coherence between usecase > - to be generalizable : any key can be filled in this way without having > to discuss the value of the key or without having to code a difference > rule in the tools that can benefit from it (I think for example of > streetcomplete) "unsigned" means there is no sign on the ground, this would not avoid noname=yes or nohousenumber=yes because they state there is no name or housenumber, not that it isn't signed. Cheers Martin
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
