On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 1:16 AM, John Smith wrote:
>> electrified=yes). I'm sure soon enough we'll have a major collision,
>> so to speak...
>
> you mean like power=station/generator etc?
No. From a technical standpoint, there's actually not a problem there,
it's technically a massive scale user
On 29 July 2010 01:14, Steve Bennett wrote:
> Yeah, that's the bit I found odd. I guess there are other examples of
> a tag meaning two different things depending on what the "main" tag is
> (eg, voltage=* can go with power=line, or railway=rail,
> electrified=yes). I'm sure soon enough we'll have
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 5:36 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
> Actually it's railway=rail service=*.
Yeah, that's the bit I found odd. I guess there are other examples of
a tag meaning two different things depending on what the "main" tag is
(eg, voltage=* can go with power=line, or railway=rail,
ele
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 3:28 AM, John Smith wrote:
> On 28 July 2010 17:25, Steve Bennett wrote:
>> For some reason it completely escaped me that service=* is supposed to
>> be used for both railways (eg, service=spur) and roads
>> (service=alley). I don't really want to debate this situation wit
On 28 July 2010 17:25, Steve Bennett wrote:
> For some reason it completely escaped me that service=* is supposed to
> be used for both railways (eg, service=spur) and roads
> (service=alley). I don't really want to debate this situation with a
> view to changing it, but could someone give me a qu
For some reason it completely escaped me that service=* is supposed to
be used for both railways (eg, service=spur) and roads
(service=alley). I don't really want to debate this situation with a
view to changing it, but could someone give me a quick explanation on
how this arose? It seems a little
