Re: [Tagging] RFC - role values for members of recreational route relations.

2020-05-20 Thread Peter Elderson
@s8evq I will strike "alternate" from the proposal. Of course, data consumers might still accept it if there is significant usage. Then I will start the "official" proposal and voting process. Best, Peter Elderson Op ma 20 apr. 2020 om 09:47 schreef s8evq : > I think this is a decent proposal.

Re: [Tagging] RFC - role values for members of recreational route relations.

2020-04-20 Thread s8evq
I think this is a decent proposal. Thanks Peter for putting it online. The only thing I would like to point out is about "alternative" or "(alternate is also accepted)". Perhaps when can decide on one of the two. As it's all new and almost no roles are currently in use, it's better to make a cl

[Tagging] RFC - role values for members of recreational route relations.

2020-04-16 Thread Peter Elderson
The previous proposal of Hiking trail role values appears to be stuck. The initiator has let me know that help would be appreciated. I then prepared a much simpler concept proposal which IMO could pass, and asked his opinion. So far he has not responded, but a helpful soul has moved my concept to "