@s8evq I will strike "alternate" from the proposal. Of course, data consumers might still accept it if there is significant usage. Then I will start the "official" proposal and voting process.
Best, Peter Elderson Op ma 20 apr. 2020 om 09:47 schreef s8evq <s8e...@runbox.com>: > I think this is a decent proposal. Thanks Peter for putting it online. > > The only thing I would like to point out is about "alternative" or > "(alternate is also accepted)". Perhaps when can decide on one of the two. > As it's all new and almost no roles are currently in use, it's better to > make a clear choice between the two. So we avoid confusion in the long term. > > Otherwise, looks all fine to me. > > On Thu, 16 Apr 2020 22:52:31 +0200, Peter Elderson <pelder...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > The previous proposal of Hiking trail role values appears to be stuck. > The > > initiator has let me know that help would be appreciated. I then > prepared a > > much simpler concept proposal which IMO could pass, and asked his > opinion. > > So far he has not responded, but a helpful soul has moved my concept to > > "proposed features", and another has added links between the two > proposals. > > The basics of the two are the same, there is no conflict, but the new > > concept is much simpler. > > > > Original proposal: > > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/hiking_trail_relation_roles > > Concept proposal: > > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Recreational_route_relation_roles > > > > * I have left out the forward and backward roles, because they conflict > > with the way they are defined and used in bicycle route relations. > > * I have left out all fancy ideas for other uses and roles. Once the > basic > > system is in place, additional roles can be discussed and passed later. > > * I have added the connection role. It enables automated planning and > > routing across different recreational routes and trails. > > * I think all recreational routes can benefit from this role set, not > just > > hiking trails. > > * The concept proposal does not require any forced changes to the > > "installed base", but if applied will enable better rendering and > > processing. > > > > I am not looking for new ideas for more uses and roles. You are welcome > to > > vent them, but I will just keep them for later. I would like constructive > > feedback on the proposal in order to get to the basic starting role set > we > > can agree on. > > > > Shoot! > > > > Best, Peter Elderson > > _______________________________________________ > > Tagging mailing list > > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
