Re: [Tagging] Public transport routes with multiple reference numbers

2016-09-13 Thread Jo
Maybe we need a way to tag a relation to indicate it's related to another relation. Or a superrelation containing both route segments. Jo 2016-09-13 10:42 GMT+02:00 Michael Tsang : > On Tuesday 13 September 2016 09:32:19 Jo wrote: > > As far as I'm concerned these are 2 separate route relations.

Re: [Tagging] Public transport routes with multiple reference numbers

2016-09-13 Thread Michael Tsang
On Tuesday 13 September 2016 09:32:19 Jo wrote: > As far as I'm concerned these are 2 separate route relations. It doesn't > really matter passengers can remain seated. When something changes like the > ref number it's a different route for the organisers. I would expect it's > also shown different

Re: [Tagging] Public transport routes with multiple reference numbers

2016-09-13 Thread Jo
As far as I'm concerned these are 2 separate route relations. It doesn't really matter passengers can remain seated. When something changes like the ref number it's a different route for the organisers. I would expect it's also shown differently on schedules. Jo 2016-09-13 8:35 GMT+02:00 Michael

Re: [Tagging] Public transport routes with multiple reference numbers

2016-09-12 Thread Michael Tsang
On Friday 05 August 2016 02:15:35 Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > 3. There is a service, due to operational reasons, identified by two > > different numbers. However, the two different numbers are used in > > different segment of the service, but in fact, they belongs to the same > > service (i.e.

Re: [Tagging] Public transport routes with multiple reference numbers

2016-08-04 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > Il giorno 03 ago 2016, alle ore 08:55, Michael Tsang ha > scritto: > > 1. There is a service identified by three different numbers, while in fact > the > three numbers belong to the same service with completely no differences. This > is the case with minibus routes 52A/

Re: [Tagging] Public transport routes with multiple reference numbers

2016-08-03 Thread Tijmen Stam
> I can only tell you how I would do it with the current scheme. If some day > in a very distant future we'll have routes built up from segments, there > might be a better way then. > > 2016-08-03 8:55 GMT+02:00 Michael Tsang : > >> Dear all, >> >> How should I fill in the ref=* tag for public tran

Re: [Tagging] Public transport routes with multiple reference numbers

2016-08-03 Thread Jo
I can only tell you how I would do it with the current scheme. If some day in a very distant future we'll have routes built up from segments, there might be a better way then. 2016-08-03 8:55 GMT+02:00 Michael Tsang : > Dear all, > > How should I fill in the ref=* tag for public transport routes

[Tagging] Public transport routes with multiple reference numbers

2016-08-02 Thread Michael Tsang
Dear all, How should I fill in the ref=* tag for public transport routes with multiple reference numbers, in each of the following cases? 1. There is a service identified by three different numbers, while in fact the three numbers belong to the same service with completely no differences. This