Re: [Tagging] Pet supplies store but doesn't sell animals

2011-06-13 Thread Dave F.
On 12/06/2011 05:04, Serge Wroclawski wrote: (cut/paste from Serge's posts) Wow! I wasn't expecting anyone to get their knickers in twist over my Q. "You, Dr. Who, are proposing changing shop=pets to now: shop=pets animals:fish=yes" No, that's not changing, that's adding, which makes OSM more

Re: [Tagging] Pet supplies store but doesn't sell animals

2011-06-12 Thread Sander Deryckere
What about this tagging schema: shop=pet_supplies for shops that don't sell pets shop=pets for shops that do sell pets, and if you want to go in detail, you can tag it animals=fish;dog;cat;horse;whale (or in the plural form if you like to) While you can give it the same amount of detail, it has s

Re: [Tagging] Pet supplies store but doesn't sell animals

2011-06-12 Thread John Smith
On 12 June 2011 14:04, Serge Wroclawski wrote: > I'll elaborate on why this is a bad idea: > > 1. It's a lot of tags Only if you want it to be, just like some people tagging trees, most won't so this isn't an issue > 2. It won't get used in real life Never assume this, after all how many trees

Re: [Tagging] Pet supplies store but doesn't sell animals

2011-06-11 Thread Andrew Errington
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 13:04:34 Serge Wroclawski wrote: > On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 10:31 PM, John Smith wrote: > >> The logical conclusion is: > >> How about shop=pet and shop=pet_supplies? I am not actually sure that it is necessary to tag things in such detail. I think it is sufficient in OSM

Re: [Tagging] Pet supplies store but doesn't sell animals

2011-06-11 Thread Serge Wroclawski
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 10:31 PM, John Smith wrote: >> The logical conclusion is: >> >> shop=pets >> animals:cats=yes >> animals:reptiles=gecko;snakes >> supplies:cat_food=dry;canned >> supplies:fish=block;flakes;filters;nets >> supplies:fish:treasure_chest=no >> ... > > I don't see a problem wit

Re: [Tagging] Pet supplies store but doesn't sell animals

2011-06-11 Thread John Smith
On 12 June 2011 02:33, Serge Wroclawski wrote: > The problem with these types of proposals, of N levels of depth of a > tag, is that they quickly become complex, and thus get unused. > > You, Dr. Who, are proposing changing shop=pets to now: > > shop=pets > animals:fish=yes > > and > > shop=pets >

Re: [Tagging] Pet supplies store but doesn't sell animals

2011-06-11 Thread Serge Wroclawski
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 6:56 PM, John Smith wrote: > On 11 June 2011 06:16, Serge Wroclawski wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 3:43 PM, Dave F. wrote: >>> Hi >>> >>> Is there a specific tag for pet supplies (food, collars, chew toys etc) >> >> I'm used to pet stores being ambigious, and don' hav

Re: [Tagging] Pet supplies store but doesn't sell animals

2011-06-10 Thread John Smith
On 11 June 2011 06:16, Serge Wroclawski wrote: > On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 3:43 PM, Dave F. wrote: >> Hi >> >> Is there a specific tag for pet supplies (food, collars, chew toys etc) > > I'm used to pet stores being ambigious, and don' have a problem with > that. But I'd say shop=pet_supplies is be

Re: [Tagging] Pet supplies store but doesn't sell animals

2011-06-10 Thread Serge Wroclawski
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 3:43 PM, Dave F. wrote: > Hi > > Is there a specific tag for pet supplies (food, collars, chew toys etc) I'm used to pet stores being ambigious, and don' have a problem with that. But I'd say shop=pet_supplies is better than animals=no. Still, I think that the distinction

[Tagging] Pet supplies store but doesn't sell animals

2011-06-10 Thread Dave F.
Hi Is there a specific tag for pet supplies (food, collars, chew toys etc) or would it be best to go with something like: shop=pet animals=no Cheers Dave F. ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/t