On 12 June 2011 14:04, Serge Wroclawski <emac...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'll elaborate on why this is a bad idea: > > 1. It's a lot of tags
Only if you want it to be, just like some people tagging trees, most won't so this isn't an issue > 2. It won't get used in real life Never assume this, after all how many trees have you tagged? > 3. It's nested In your opinion. > 4. It's apt to change > > animals:fish = yes is you listing a store's inventory. > > It would be the same as > > store=clothing > men:bowties=yes Nonsense, at least compare apples to apples, store=clothing, clothing:mens=yes > Inventory changes, and this leads to increasingly bizare tagging of > individual items. > > After all, why stop at "fish" > > animals:fish:neon_tetras=yes > animals:fish:angel_fish=no You are the one trying to prove your point by being overly specific and then stating being overly specific is a bad thing. > 5. It's outside the reasonable scope of the project. At lot of people claim this about many things, tagging individual pens at a zoo might not interest some people, but it does others. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
