On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 9:10 AM, Phil! Gold wrote:
> * Anthony [2010-05-18 20:47 -0400]:
> > On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 10:11 AM, Tyler Gunn wrote:
> > > Almost all of these types of parking lots will have some kind of
> > > notice that tow-away is enforced for unauthorized parking. So the
> gene
* Anthony [2010-05-18 20:47 -0400]:
> On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 10:11 AM, Tyler Gunn wrote:
> > Almost all of these types of parking lots will have some kind of
> > notice that tow-away is enforced for unauthorized parking. So the general
> > idea is you're free to park there, ONLY if you're visit
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Anthony wrote:
>
> Sounds like access=private, unless and until there's a more specific tag.
>
> Access=public? No, the public has no right of access.
> Access=permissive? No, the owner does not give *general* permission to
> access.
> Access=destination? No,
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 10:11 AM, Tyler Gunn wrote:
> Almost all of these types of parking lots will have some kind of
> notice that tow-away is enforced for unauthorized parking. So the general
> idea is you're free to park there, ONLY if you're visiting the businesses
> serviced by the lot.
>
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 6:57 AM, Seventy 7 wrote:
>> > Use access=permissive instead of access=customer and you get what's in
>> > use for years.
>>
>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Access says access=permissive means
>> "The owner gives general permission for access."
>>
>> This doesn't seem
2010/5/19 Greg Troxel :
> I would call the first access=destination and the second access=permissive.
yes, by thinking it over I also see some space for a restriction
between permissive and private and destination is more "elegant" cause
it uses an already introduced value for access.
cheers,
Ma
"Seventy 7" writes:
>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Access says access=permissive means
>> "The owner gives general permission for access."
>>
>> This doesn't seem consistent with parking restricted to customers. Do
>> you think this is a problem? I think, if access=* is to mean something
> > Use access=permissive instead of access=customer and you get what's in
> > use for years.
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Access says access=permissive means
> "The owner gives general permission for access."
>
> This doesn't seem consistent with parking restricted to customers. Do
> y
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 5:23 PM, Ulf Lamping wrote:
>
> Use access=permissive instead of access=customer and you get what's in
> use for years.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Access says access=permissive means
"The owner gives general permission for access."
This doesn't seem consistent wit
> I was thinking access=destination although then you need to link the
> parking lot to the destination, although you probably would for
> access=customer as well since you might need to know where to spend
> money, or window shop, to be considered a customer.
I like this; access=destination defi
2010/5/18 Ulf Lamping :
> Use access=permissive instead of access=customer and you get what's in
> use for years.
+1
cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
On 18 May 2010 17:23, Ulf Lamping wrote:
> Use access=permissive instead of access=customer and you get what's in
> use for years.
I was thinking access=destination although then you need to link the
parking lot to the destination, although you probably would for
access=customer as well since you
Am 18.05.2010 09:13, schrieb Roy Wallace:
> On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Roy Wallace wrote:
>>
>> I propose to add the following to the Parking wiki page, in the table
>> of the "Tags" section, as follows:
>> (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Parking)
>>
>> Column "Key": access
>> Column "Va
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Roy Wallace wrote:
>
> I propose to add the following to the Parking wiki page, in the table
> of the "Tags" section, as follows:
> (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Parking)
>
> Column "Key": access
> Column "Value": public/customer/private
> Column "Element": [
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 1:52 PM, Tyler Gunn wrote:
>
> > From http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Parking:
> > "The distinction between public parking lots, customer parking lots
> > (such as at cinemas etc.), and private parking lots (such as for staff
> > in a business park) is handled with acces
> From http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Parking:
> "The distinction between public parking lots, customer parking lots
> (such as at cinemas etc.), and private parking lots (such as for staff
> in a business park) is handled with access=* tags."
> To me, reading that directly that would seem to
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 12:11 AM, Tyler Gunn wrote:
>
> 1. What should the "access" for these parking lots be? access=public
> would seem to be appropriate, but in some regards that's not entirely
> accurate. Almost all of these types of parking lots will have some kind of
> notice that tow-away
I was using the OSM maps for my city on my Garmin recently and when I
listed the "parking" POIs I noticed a whole slew of parking showing up in
there; mainly "unnamed".. It got me thinking why those are in there but
then it dawned on me that in my area I've started adding in the parking
lots and
18 matches
Mail list logo
