> From http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Parking: > "The distinction between public parking lots, customer parking lots > (such as at cinemas etc.), and private parking lots (such as for staff > in a business park) is handled with access=* tags." > To me, reading that directly that would seem to suggest using one of > three values: > access=public, or > access=customer, or > access=private. > Of these, in your case you would clearly use access=customer. > But there may be other opinions out there. Ideally, we do want to make > sure the documented access=* values for parking are 1) verifiable, 2) > mutually-exclusive, 3) useful.
According to OSMDoc and Tagwatch there are a handful of access:customer tags out there, and maybe 100 access:customers. So it's clearly not an accepted value yet. I'd agree with the 3 values you proposed though; really access=customer is the only new one. Makes sense to me too because it allows for a true distinction between general public parking (like multi-story parkades that are in the business of parking cars regardless of where the people are going), and parking lots intended to service the customers of a store, business, etc. Tyler _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
