Nathan Edgars II wrote:
> So much for your "ground truth", eh?
> [...]
> Obviously you know nothing about this specific case, and should not
> be making bogus suggestions about tagging.
Could we calm this down a bit, please? Thank you.
Richard
tagging@ admin
--
View this message in context:
2012/1/21 Toby Murray :
> The sign carries the name of this area. It is sitting in the middle of
> a short section of split carriageway residential road indicating that
> "you are now entering the Sharingbrook neighborhood. I would say that
> includes the road.
Yes, I'd also see roads as parts of
On Sat, 2012-01-21 at 22:37 -0500, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
> On 1/21/2012 10:30 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > On Sat, 2012-01-21 at 22:23 -0500, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
> >> Are there examples of places
> >> where there is a one-to-one mapping between neighborhoods and
> >> administrative units?
> >
On 1/21/2012 10:30 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Sat, 2012-01-21 at 22:23 -0500, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
Are there examples of places
where there is a one-to-one mapping between neighborhoods and
administrative units?
Portland, Oregon has fixed districts. So does New York City (though it
calls th
On Sat, 2012-01-21 at 22:23 -0500, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
> On 1/21/2012 9:42 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > On Sat, 2012-01-21 at 20:56 -0500, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
> >> On 1/21/2012 8:50 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
> >>> On Sat, 2012-01-21 at 13:39 -0600, Toby Murray wrote:
> Unfortunately I don
On 1/21/2012 9:42 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Sat, 2012-01-21 at 20:56 -0500, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
On 1/21/2012 8:50 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Sat, 2012-01-21 at 13:39 -0600, Toby Murray wrote:
Unfortunately I don't have a good picture of this myself so here is a
kind of crappy streetview s
On Sat, 2012-01-21 at 20:56 -0500, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
> On 1/21/2012 8:50 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > On Sat, 2012-01-21 at 13:39 -0600, Toby Murray wrote:
> >> Unfortunately I don't have a good picture of this myself so here is a
> >> kind of crappy streetview shot: http://kan.st/yG
> >>
> >>
On 1/21/2012 8:50 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Sat, 2012-01-21 at 13:39 -0600, Toby Murray wrote:
Unfortunately I don't have a good picture of this myself so here is a
kind of crappy streetview shot: http://kan.st/yG
The sign carries the name of this area. It is sitting in the middle of
a short s
On Sat, 2012-01-21 at 13:39 -0600, Toby Murray wrote:
> Unfortunately I don't have a good picture of this myself so here is a
> kind of crappy streetview shot: http://kan.st/yG
>
> The sign carries the name of this area. It is sitting in the middle of
> a short section of split carriageway residen
On Sat, 2012-01-21 at 08:13 -0500, Anthony wrote:
> Part of it is set aside legally for putting things like roads and
> sidewalks and light poles and gutters.
That's landuse=highway, not landuse=residential.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Unfortunately I don't have a good picture of this myself so here is a
kind of crappy streetview shot: http://kan.st/yG
The sign carries the name of this area. It is sitting in the middle of
a short section of split carriageway residential road indicating that
"you are now entering the Sharingbrook
On 1/21/2012 8:58 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
+1, that's also the reason for which I prefer finer granular objects
and not the huge ones (which btw. tend to become hardly managable
multipolygon-monsters by the time).
As opposed to a landuse for each small clump of parcels and each
highway?
2012/1/21 Anthony :
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 1:57 AM, Bryce2 Nesbitt wrote:
>> The road is a road: it has meaning, semantics, access rules.
>> It is fully capable of representing itself overlaid on various land
>> use: be they forest, residential, military or commercial.
>
> I'm not talking about
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 1:57 AM, Bryce2 Nesbitt wrote:
Because the land is used (and zoned) for a different purpose.
>>>
>>> A residential street is used for residential purposes: traveling to and from
>>> a house, parking cars, playing ball...
>>
>> It's also used for non-residential purpose
>>> Because the land is used (and zoned) for a different purpose.
>>
>> A residential street is used for residential purposes: traveling to and from
>> a house, parking cars, playing ball...
>
> It's also used for non-residential purposes.
The road is a road: it has meaning, semantics, access rule
Allow me to remind another advantage of a detailed landuse mapping.
I've mapped cultivated land lot by lot around Vercelli. Not only this
allows to detail the crop types (rather than saying that between
Chivasso and Pavia it's "mostly" rice), but it also makes it possible
to make precise and punctu
2012/1/17 Nathan Edgars II :
> On 1/17/2012 11:18 AM, Anthony wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Nathan Edgars II
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 1/17/2012 10:32 AM, Anthony wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Nathan Edgars II
wrote:
>
> A residential street is u
On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 09:42 -0500, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
> On 1/17/2012 8:37 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> > 2012/1/17 Nathan Edgars II:
> >> Splitting it at roads gives no benefit and complicates editing greatly.
> >> This
> >> is just ridiculous:
> >> http://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?lat=3
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
> On 1/17/2012 11:18 AM, Anthony wrote:
>> And the primary use of the land is for travel (and not just travel to
>> and from a house, the most common travel is probably between a house
>> and work).
>
> Between a house and work is to or fro
On 1/17/2012 11:18 AM, Anthony wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
On 1/17/2012 10:32 AM, Anthony wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Nathan Edgars II
wrote:
A residential street is used for residential purposes: traveling to and
from
a house, parking cars
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
> On 1/17/2012 10:32 AM, Anthony wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Nathan Edgars II
>> wrote:
>>> A residential street is used for residential purposes: traveling to and
>>> from
>>> a house, parking cars, playing ball...
>>
>
On 1/17/2012 10:32 AM, Anthony wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
On 1/17/2012 10:00 AM, Anthony wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 9:42 AM, Nathan Edgars II
wrote:
But why punch out the land
taken up by road right-of-way within the subdivision?
Because the la
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
> On 1/17/2012 10:00 AM, Anthony wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 9:42 AM, Nathan Edgars II
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> But why punch out the land
>>> taken up by road right-of-way within the subdivision?
>>
>>
>> Because the land is used (and z
On 1/17/2012 10:00 AM, Anthony wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 9:42 AM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
But why punch out the land
taken up by road right-of-way within the subdivision?
Because the land is used (and zoned) for a different purpose.
A residential street is used for residential purposes
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 9:42 AM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
> But why punch out the land
> taken up by road right-of-way within the subdivision?
Because the land is used (and zoned) for a different purpose.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.o
On 1/17/2012 8:37 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2012/1/17 Nathan Edgars II:
Splitting it at roads gives no benefit and complicates editing greatly. This
is just ridiculous:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?lat=35.323225&lon=-119.077089&zoom=18
how does that complicate anything? Connecting r
26 matches
Mail list logo
