Volker Schmidt wrote:
As EV routes are not managed as single entities, every route is split in
pieces managed on a country basis. I know the situation in Italy, as I am
involved in regional and national cycle routes here. EV routes are handled
by BicItalia which is part of FIAB, the "Italian Fede
On Sun, Mar 5, 2017 at 12:55 PM, Volker Schmidt wrote:
> As EV routes are not managed as single entities, every route is split in
> pieces managed on a country basis. I know the situation in Italy, as I am
> involved in regional and national cycle routes here. EV routes are handled
> by BicItalia
It ought to be possible to use hierarchy in those relations. That way you
would map them at the national level and group them for the international
level.
Same for that route that is mtb/hiking/horse. 1 route containing the ways,
then reuse for the other 2. At the moment I would tag that one with
I have a route that is
mountain bike and
hiking and
horse
the route=mtb;hiking;horse functions .. at least for hiking and horse
..(but not mtb on
https://mtb.waymarkedtrails.org/#?map=6!-35.8356!149.48 - change it to
horse or hiking to see mapped sections of the BNT)
the network tag .. I ha
As EV routes are not managed as single entities, every route is split in
pieces managed on a country basis. I know the situation in Italy, as I am
involved in regional and national cycle routes here. EV routes are handled
by BicItalia which is part of FIAB, the "Italian Federation of Friends of
the
Europe has numerous international cycle routes signposted and marketed
as 'EuroVelo', and these are often mapped in OSM:
http://www.eurovelo.com/
Unfortunately the tagging is pretty inconsistent, especially when routes
are shared with national/regional (NCN/RCN) routes, as is usually t
