Re: [Tagging] Direct reduced iron plants

2024-04-26 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 26 Apr 2024, at 14:34, Daniel Evans wrote: > > Thanks. I have been partly lost between some competing (but perhaps poorly > supported) proposals which suggested more focus on making the `industrial=` > tag more detailed. I'll give some thought to what a sequence of `wo

Re: [Tagging] Direct reduced iron plants

2024-04-26 Thread Daniel Evans
Hi Martin, Thanks. I have been partly lost between some competing (but perhaps poorly supported) proposals which suggested more focus on making the `industrial=` tag more detailed. I'll give some thought to what a sequence of `works:x` tags might look like. Cheers, Daniel On Fri, 26 Apr 2024 at

Re: [Tagging] Direct reduced iron plants

2024-04-26 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 26 Apr 2024, at 13:11, Daniel Evans wrote: > > It sounds like your feeling is that the tagging of industrial sites should be > closer to power=plant and the associated plant:x tags. I say it already is like this. The meaning of landuse=industrial is land used for in

Re: [Tagging] Direct reduced iron plants

2024-04-26 Thread Daniel Evans
Hi Martin, It sounds like your feeling is that the tagging of industrial sites should be closer to power=plant and the associated plant:x tags. If I'm understanding your thinking correctly, something like: * man_made=works should live within a landuse=industrial - although they may be the same pol

Re: [Tagging] Direct reduced iron plants

2024-04-26 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 26 Apr 2024, at 09:30, Daniel Evans wrote: > > Differentiating with different `product=` values doesn't seem sensible - both > types of works "produce steel", and getting into specific types of steel > doesn't help. The two `landuse=industrial + industrial=x` tags do a

Re: [Tagging] Direct reduced iron plants

2024-04-26 Thread Daniel Evans
Hi Romain, On steel mill tagging, I think there are at least three ways of tagging that are in reasonably common use - `industrial=steelmaking` is also used. I've been told this is a fairly contentious topic! Is the overall feeling these days that `man_made=works` is the preferred trend? At risk

Re: [Tagging] Direct reduced iron plants

2024-04-25 Thread _ _
Hi Daniel ! The third seems to me the best solution if there isn't already a tag. This will allow you to add information rather than modify existing ones. I'd like to point out that there's also another way of tagging steel mills: man_made=works + product=steel wich is way more common (260 times

[Tagging] Direct reduced iron plants

2024-04-25 Thread Daniel Evans
Hi all, In the steel industry, a process which has started gaining adoption in recent years is the production of steel from Direct Reduced Iron (DRI), rather than from pig iron produced from iron ore in a blast furnace. To give context, the two existing widespread methods of steel production are: