Hi Martin, It sounds like your feeling is that the tagging of industrial sites should be closer to power=plant and the associated plant:x tags. If I'm understanding your thinking correctly, something like: * man_made=works should live within a landuse=industrial - although they may be the same polygon for a low detail level of mapping or an industrial site with only one facility. * product= should work as it currently does * Some sub-tags such as works:type=steel_mill; works:method=basic_oxygen, similar to how power:source and power:method work
Cheers, Daniel On Fri, 26 Apr 2024 at 08:51, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > sent from a phone > > > On 26 Apr 2024, at 09:30, Daniel Evans <daniel.fred.ev...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Differentiating with different `product=` values doesn't seem sensible - > both types of works "produce steel", and getting into specific types of > steel doesn't help. The two `landuse=industrial + industrial=x` tags do > allow that differentiation. Is there any existing or proposed tagging > scheme under `man_made=works` to encode that level of detail? > > > the landuse tagging isn’t suitable to describe features, it is about > landuse. An area with different steel producing works could be tagged all > on the same polygon, while man_made=works is about an individual factory. > If details are missing for meaningful distinctions of man_made=works > tagging it can be introduced. > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
