Am Fr., 18. Okt. 2024 um 16:42 Uhr schrieb Marc_marc via Tagging <
tagging@openstreetmap.org>:
> Le 15.10.24 à 16:29, Michael Tsang a écrit :
> > how should I interpret the default access= value for indoor=area
> > for routing purpose?
>
> we're not supposed to map private premises.
> therefore i
Marc_marc via Tagging writes:
> Le 15.10.24 à 16:29, Michael Tsang a écrit :
>> how should I interpret the default access= value for indoor=area for
>> routing purpose?
>
> we're not supposed to map private premises.
that gets complicated
> therefore i consider all indoor=* to be access=yes by
Le 15.10.24 à 16:29, Michael Tsang a écrit :
how should I interpret the default access= value for indoor=area
for routing purpose?
we're not supposed to map private premises.
therefore i consider all indoor=* to be access=yes by default,
or at least foot=yes
_
On 15.10.24 at 16:29, Michael Tsang wrote:
I have checked the wiki again and the difference is between an area and
a room is the former is not walled, while the latter is walled, and it
says nothing about the access.
You're correct that the only difference between indoor=area and
indoor=room
On 16/10/24 01:29, Michael Tsang wrote:
Hi all,
I am now working on improving navigation inside train stations, and
encountered a case where I need to route over indoor=area. I have
submitted a pull request into OpenTripPlanner
https://github.com/opentripplanner/OpenTripPlanner/pull/6119 ,
Hi all,
I am now working on improving navigation inside train stations, and encountered
a case
where I need to route over indoor=area. I have submitted a pull request into
OpenTripPlanner https://github.com/opentripplanner/OpenTripPlanner/pull/6119[1]
,
but a reviewer has pointed me potential
