On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 9:03 PM, Philip Barnes wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-07-19 at 11:04 +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
> Pubs that are over foodie, tables laid etc, should in my opinion be
> tagged as restaurants. Those have lost their primary focus as a place to
> go for a drink, to meet peop
On Fri, 2013-07-19 at 11:04 +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> Another object that comes to my mind is amenity=pub. You will usually
> get something to eat in a pub in the UK, but you won't in many German
> "amenity=pub" (indeed it might have been a good idea to invent
> something dedicated for
Serge Wroclawski wrote:
> As for kindergarten, while the name may have an obvious German
> origin, my question is what the British definition of the word is,
> since it's British English that we use in OSM as our base language,
> and does that British definition differ from the US definition.
"
On 19/07/2013 12:50, Serge Wroclawski wrote:
As for kindergarten, while the name may have an obvious German origin,
my question is what the British definition of the word is, since it's
British English that we use in OSM as our base language, and does that
British definition differ from the US
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 3:15 AM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> On 07/19/2013 03:33 AM, Serge Wroclawski wrote:
>>>
>>> Of the solutions, I feel that calling it what it's called locally is
>>> preferable. Anyone who cares to compare across countries is going to
>>> have
>>> to parse the location first a
2013/7/19 Frederik Ramm
> On 07/19/2013 03:33 AM, Serge Wroclawski wrote:
>>
>> We've managed to handle creating definitions that we could use
>> worldwide for pretty much everything else, including roads, sports,
>> other schools, various amenities, etc.
>>
>
> Have we really?
>
> In Italy (and
Hi,
On 07/19/2013 03:33 AM, Serge Wroclawski wrote:
Of the solutions, I feel that calling it what it's called locally is
preferable. Anyone who cares to compare across countries is going to have
to parse the location first anyway.
We've managed to handle creating definitions that we could use
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 9:11 PM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
> Of the solutions, I feel that calling it what it's called locally is
> preferable. Anyone who cares to compare across countries is going to have
> to parse the location first anyway.
We've managed to handle creating definitions that we cou
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 7:00 AM, Pieren wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 3:07 PM, alyssa wright
> wrote:
>
> > It is my understanding that kindergarten means something very different
> in other places of the world. How does OSM account for such cultural
> differences?
>
Of the solutions, I feel
If the mapper thinks to look, or is even aware the wiki exists.
Plant nursery is not normal, or obvious, usage.
Phil (trigpoint)
--
Sent from my Nokia N9
On 10/07/2013 15:16 Pieren wrote:
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Philip Barnes wrote:
> we need to be careful with nursery, can easily
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Philip Barnes wrote:
> we need to be careful with nursery, can easily be mixed up with a place you
> go to buy plants.
Use "plant_nursery", e.g.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dplant_nursery
Pieren
___
we need to be careful with nursery, can easily be mixed up with a place you go
to buy plants.
Phil (trigpoint)
--
Sent from my Nokia N9
On 10/07/2013 14:42 fly wrote:
Am 10.07.2013 15:07, schrieb alyssa wright:
> On Jul 10, 2013, at 7:45 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
> wrote:
>> 2013/7/10 fly :
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 3:07 PM, alyssa wright wrote:
> It is my understanding that kindergarten means something very different in
> other places of the world. How does OSM account for such cultural differences?
Ant the wiki about "nursery" is redirecting to "amenity=kindergarten" ([1])...
We
2013/7/10 alyssa wright :
> It is my understanding that kindergarten means something very different in
> other places of the world. How does OSM account for such cultural
> differences? Perhaps the childcare proposal should not try to replace
> kindergarten, but instead try to disassociate child
Am 10.07.2013 15:07, schrieb alyssa wright:
> Again, thanks for all the discussion. I'm following most of it. ;) I think...
>
> Could I attempt to articulate what I consider the major confusion in the
> existing kindergarten tag? Perhaps this is already known, but perhaps an
> explanation could
Am 10.07.2013 15:07, schrieb alyssa wright:
> On Jul 10, 2013, at 7:45 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
> wrote:
>> 2013/7/10 fly :
> Again, thanks for all the discussion. I'm following most of it. ;) I think...
This is nothing unusual here,
> Could I attempt to articulate what I consider the major con
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 2:07 PM, alyssa wright wrote:
> Again, thanks for all the discussion. I'm following most of it. ;) I
> think...
>
> Could I attempt to articulate what I consider the major confusion in the
> existing kindergarten tag? Perhaps this is already known, but perhaps an
> explanat
Again, thanks for all the discussion. I'm following most of it. ;) I think...
Could I attempt to articulate what I consider the major confusion in the
existing kindergarten tag? Perhaps this is already known, but perhaps an
explanation could inspire a graceful resolution.
In the US, (and accord
Am 09.07.2013 20:29, schrieb Frederik Ramm:
> On 09.07.2013 19:13, alyssa wright wrote:
>> Yes, people keep saying that. But as a new editor, my inclination is to
>> use approved tags and not ones that are in the proposal stage.
>
> Most new editors (in the "human being" sense) tend to use the tag
2013/7/10 fly :
>> Again, what is "It" referring to here? And can you give some
>> suggestions on how to make the proposal better?
>
> I was thinking about something like social_amenity=* (no good example!)
> or adding some key word in front separated with a colon.
what about
childcare=*
(or chi
Am 10.07.2013 12:57, schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
> 2013/7/9 alyssa wright :
> it doesn't dictate it, but as he wrote: using a new value for the
> amenity key in order to introduce a new tag for stuff that is already
> (at least partly) covered by different, well established and highly
> used valu
Am 09.07.2013 18:50, schrieb alyssa wright:
> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 12:35 PM, fly
>> Am 09.07.2013 17:35, schrieb alyssa wright:
> Sorry, I don't really follow. So some questions inline:
My fault, I did not well explain, especially for someone new. - Sorry.
>>> I'm new to this proposed tagging
2013/7/9 Chris Hill :
> There are no approved tags in OSM. You can use any tag you want,
+1, yes but you have to respect other people's work, and sometimes
these two rules do conflict.
> so if the
> childcare tags suit you, use them.
-1, I wouldn't use the amenity-tag as it will conflict with
2013/7/9 alyssa wright :
>> My main concern is that deprecating amenity=kindergarden will not
>> work/be accepted and that it is not flexible enough, e.g. you can not
>> use it with other amenities.
+1
> Even if there aren't major changes to the proposals perhaps the needs of OSM
> have shifted
On 7/9/2013 5:42 PM, Serge Wroclawski wrote:
Because some people like voting. Some people like bureaucracy, and
rules of order, and all that, and so we have one for them.
And some people like the idea that someone might eventually be able to
consume the tags in a useful application.
___
John Sturdy writes:
>
> It would probably be good to re-open discussion (and add your voice to
> it, particularly as you have an interest in using such a tag); after
> that, I think this one could be ready to vote on.
>
> __John
>
> On 7/9/13, alyssa wright gmail.com> wrote:
> > Thanks. I'm be
Thanks Serge for the clarification. Super helpful.
So as John suggested, I'll add my feedback to the existing thread and ask for a
vote as I too enjoy voting.
Best,
Alyssa.
On Jul 9, 2013, at 5:42 PM, Serge Wroclawski wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 1:13 PM, alyssa wright wrote:
>> Yes,
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 1:13 PM, alyssa wright wrote:
> Yes, people keep saying that. But as a new editor, my inclination is to use
> approved tags and not ones that are in the proposal stage. This is
> consistent in what I've seen anecdotally with new members. This tag has yet
> to go up for a vot
It would probably be good to re-open discussion (and add your voice to
it, particularly as you have an interest in using such a tag); after
that, I think this one could be ready to vote on.
__John
On 7/9/13, alyssa wright wrote:
> Thanks. I'm beginning to get a better sense of how things operate
Thanks. I'm beginning to get a better sense of how things operate.
Appreciate the patience. That said -- how does one move a proposed tag to a
vote? Like can I call one right now?
Best,
Alyssa.
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 2:29 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On 09.07.2013 19:13, alyssa wright
Hi,
On 09.07.2013 19:13, alyssa wright wrote:
Yes, people keep saying that. But as a new editor, my inclination is to
use approved tags and not ones that are in the proposal stage.
Most new editors (in the "human being" sense) tend to use the tags
offered by their editors (in the "software" s
Yes, people keep saying that. But as a new editor, my inclination is to use
approved tags and not ones that are in the proposal stage. This is
consistent in what I've seen anecdotally with new members. This tag has yet
to go up for a vote. How can it go up for a vote? But then why even have a
votin
There are no approved tags in OSM. You can use any tag you want, so if the
childcare tags suit you, use them.
I agree that discussion and documentation are very helpful, but a few negative
votes (even thousands of negative votes) cannot stop the tag being used. There
are no tag police, no appro
Sorry, I don't really follow. So some questions inline:
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 12:35 PM, fly wrote:
> Am 09.07.2013 17:35, schrieb alyssa wright:
> Hey Alyssa
>
> > I'm new to this proposed tagging process etc, but I wanted to know what
> > happened with this childcare tag proposal?
> >
> > htt
Am 09.07.2013 17:35, schrieb alyssa wright:
Hey Alyssa
> I'm new to this proposed tagging process etc, but I wanted to know what
> happened with this childcare tag proposal?
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/childcare2.0
>
I really do not see any major changes to the reje
Hi,
I'm new to this proposed tagging process etc, but I wanted to know what
happened with this childcare tag proposal?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/childcare2.0
Thanks,
Alyssa.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
36 matches
Mail list logo
