Re: [Tagging] Substation proposal approved - and a suggestion for a post-vote change

but why is not possible to change all the sub_station in substation if the old value is deprecated? -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Substation-proposal-approved-and-a-suggestion-for-a-post-vote-change-tp5781224p5786932.html Sent from the Tagging mailing list arch

Re: [Tagging] [Power] sub_station vs substation

But is not possible to convert all the old sub_station in substation? The tag is same only correct. -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Power-sub-station-vs-substation-tp5783760p5784779.html Sent from the Tagging mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _

Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - Power transmission refinement - 2nd RFC

I read the page Classification_of_Powerlines and for power line there are electric line, phone line, ecc -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Feature-proposal-Power-transmission-refinement-2nd-RF

Re: [Tagging] [Power] sub_station vs substation

I think that problem is present because in Josm the value is not change? Is it possible to change this? -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Power-sub-station-vs-substation-tp5783760p5783773.html Sent from the Tagging mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - (automated_external_defibrillator)

Start new vote for select the value of this proposal. Please all that have just vote for the first vote to take a choice. -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Feature-Proposal-Voting-automated-external-defibrillator-tp5779375p5779747.html Sent from the Tagging mailing

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - via_ferrata

And I don't know why the writer of this proposal stop the work about 1 years. -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Feature-Proposal-RFC-via-ferrata-tp5776186p5779745.html Sent from the Tagging mailing list archive at Nabble.com. __

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - via_ferrata

The problem is the use of two scale, German and French. Same for path I propose the use of only one scale (german) because it don't have the scale 0. Then only Via Ferrata that required equipment are tagged as Via Ferrata, the other as path with equiped (same as Proposal wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki

Re: [Tagging] cycle hierarchy

for me is not a good idea, there is just classification about it. -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/cycle-hierarchy-tp5779417p5779743.html Sent from the Tagging mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Tagging mailing lis

Re: [Tagging] Hiking route abandoned

None have other suggestion? And about the use of abandoned? -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Hiking-route-abandoned-tp5779272p5779633.html Sent from the Tagging mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Tagging mailing li

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - (automated_external_defibrillator)

Excuse me but I'm not expert in this operation. Can you do this? -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Feature-Proposal-Voting-automated-external-defibrillator-tp5779375p5779602.html Sent from the Tagging mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - via_ferrata

Or change this proposal or cancel the proposal wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Safety_measures_on_hiking_trails because they have same meaning. And I saw what is a via ferrata, I'm an alpin troupe officer. The meaning of first grade of scale actualy is for equiped path and not for via ferrata. --

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - via_ferrata

I read that many people suggest this but not change in the proposal. -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Feature-Proposal-RFC-via-ferrata-tp5776186p5779587.html Sent from the Tagging mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - via_ferrata

Then I suggest to cancel the point 1 of the via_ferrata_scale because in it is write "Equipment Via-Ferrata kit not needed". -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Feature-Proposal-RFC-via-ferrata-tp5776186p5779586.html Sent from the Tagging mailing list archive at Nab

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - (automated_external_defibrillator)

But is possible to change the proposal now that some people have vote? -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Feature-Proposal-Voting-automated-external-defibrillator-tp5779375p5779584.html Sent from the Tagging mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - (automated_external_defibrillator)

One year of no discussion and now that start the vote many problem. AED is actual in use in OSM then I don't see problem. If user don't like this can vote no to proposal. -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Feature-Proposal-Voting-automated-external-defibrillator-tp5

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - via_ferrata

the via ferrata have different scale of difficult respect the sac_scale, but I'm not the writer of this proposal. I only want to proceed with it. -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Feature-Proposal-RFC-via-ferrata-tp5776186p5779482.html Sent from the Tagging mailing

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - (automated_external_defibrillator)

+1 infact in italiy the abbreviation is DAE, only the symbol is same in all state. I'm not the writer of this proposal, but it's possible to change it now that the vote it start? -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Feature-Proposal-Voting-automated-external-defibril

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - via_ferrata

For me all path are equiped with some technical equipment are via ferrata, because with this tag you see in the map that in that point the path have some technical equipment. And because the first scale grade of via ferrata say "No equipment requaired". All map write cross in the point with techni

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - (automated_external_defibrillator)

The automated_external_defibrillator proposal has now been stable for some time. It is therefore time to announce the voting on this proposal. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/automated_external_defibrillator

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - via_ferrata

Who decided the start of voting? Is just 2 yaers without no discussion. The feature is good for alpin tagging. If none that write the proposal are present I try to restart the process. -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Feature-Proposal-RFC-via-ferrata-tp5776186p57

[Tagging] Hiking route abandoned

I have one hiking route with relation that was abandoned by the operator. Now do I have to cancell the relation or for the moment is better to tag abandoned:ref= and abandoned:operator= in the relation? Thanks -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Hiking-route-abandone

Re: [Tagging] waterfall

Can we modify the proposal natural=waterfall because the writer stop the work? -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/waterfall-tp5778845p5779186.html Sent from the Tagging mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Tagging mail

Re: [Tagging] waterfall

fly high wrote > but they are called falls (natural=waterfalls ?). +1 falls is better -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/waterfall-tp5778845p5779185.html Sent from the Tagging mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Tagg

Re: [Tagging] Post vote clean up

Ok thanks -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Post-vote-clean-up-tp5779068p5779182.html Sent from the Tagging mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetm

Re: [Tagging] Post vote clean up

The proposal is this amenity=toilets It'is in Approved and in Post vote list -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Post-vote-clean-up-tp5779068p5779097.html Sent from the Tagging mailing l

[Tagging] Post vote clean up

How can I delete a Proposed from this list. I put the status approved but no change in the list. -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Post-vote-clean-up-tp5779068.html Sent from the Tagging mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Product

This proposal status are voting, but Vote end is 01-12-2012 why stop the process? -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Feature-Proposal-RFC-Product-tp5730032p5779064.html Sent from the Tagging mailing list archive at Nabble.com. __

Re: [Tagging] waterfall

Niagara Falls are tagged as area with tag waterway=waterfall + natural=cliff. For me waterway=waterfall is better for node or segment of waterway. Or with key waterfall=yes And natural=waterfall is better for large river that use riverbank. Only for way or area. Render as cliff but blue. -- Vi

Re: [Tagging] waterfall

voschix wrote > No, my not was about basic physics, admittedly a bit pedantic: > As most waterfalls have a horizontal movement component in addition to > the > component caused by gravity, the point where the falling water hits the > ground is not exactly bellow the point where it starts its fall.

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - via_ferrata

But sometimes the via ferrata is part of the path, the have the same ref. And why don't use the scale difficult of SAC for klettersteg? Klettersteg difficult SAC -- View this message in

[Tagging] waterfall

Why there'are two method for tagging waterfall? I see waterway=waterfall and natural=waterfall. The first had a page osm very poor and the second is proposed feature, but abbandoned. Can we take a solution? -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/waterfall-tp5778845.ht

Re: [Tagging] Power tower and pole usefulness

Andreas Labres wrote > On 21.09.13 21:16, Ole Nielsen wrote: >> On 21/09/2013 21:01, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: >>> I continue to oppose the usage of man_made=tower for electricity lattice >>> towers (that what has been power=tower until now and which is 4,8 >>> Million times in use). Why should we

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Substation Refinement

When finish this discussion? Why not vote? -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Feature-Proposal-RFC-Substation-Refinement-tp5762146p5777406.html Sent from the Tagging mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Tagging mailing

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Substation Refinement

Another question. But the pole with transformer is a substation? For me is better to tag it as a Pole because really I see a pole, not all people know a transformer. Then if I put transformer=yes I see there is a transformer in the pole. -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.na

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Substation Refinement

In Italy there are many substation like this Cabina Enel the line arrive in the building. How can I tag this? Actually building=yes + power=sub_station, but for JOSM if I connect del line with the node of substation take me