.2020 14:19, Skyler Hawthorne wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 16, 2020, at 05:44, Tom Pfeifer wrote:
> > > What is written on the sign at this junction? If "North" is
> > > mentioned there I would behappy enough with the tagging above.
> >
> > That is corre
On Wed, Dec 16, 2020, at 05:44, Tom Pfeifer wrote:
Trying to understand your question, the way in your example is tagged:
destination Troy
destination:ref I 787 North
From the data consumer perspective, such tagging will generate a navigation
instruction:
"turn slightly right towards Tro
I've seen a few examples in both New York and California put in the tags of
on-ramps the destination:ref that has the direction in it, e.g.:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/5566969
However, after looking through the wiki, to my surprise, I cannot find this
practice mentioned anywhere. It made
Hi everyone,
A couple weeks ago, I started a thread regarding how to tag terrace
buildings when the entire building has a name. I proposed an alternative
tagging scheme to handle such cases, and others where it's clear that the
building is one cohesive unit.
As a result of that discussion, I
evels of ambiguity in the real world would be useful.
--
Skyler
--
Skyler
On July 7, 2020 18:06:26 Paul Allen wrote:
On Tue, 7 Jul 2020 at 22:41, Skyler Hawthorne wrote:
My own personal interpretation would be to say that if two houses share
a wall, they are part of the same building. Build
On Tue, 2020-07-07 at 22:14 +0100, Paul Allen wrote:
> Consider a house. In your understanding it is both a building and a
> house,
> and we tag it building=house. Now consider another house is built
> adjacent and conjoining, so that they share a side wall. Two houses
> in your understanding.
On Tue, 2020-07-07 at 21:00 +0100, Paul Allen wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Jul 2020 at 20:32, Skyler Hawthorne
> wrote:
> > Maybe it wasn't clear, but what I'm suggesting isn't to remove the
> > suggestion of tagging as individual building=houses, but adding
> > ano
On Tue, 2020-07-07 at 19:42 +0100, Neil Matthews wrote:
> Do not change the wiki - there are many different equally valid ways
> of
> tagging terraced houses. I favour breaking terraces into individual
> dwellings/houses.
Thanks for your feedback. I'm sorry, but I think your second sentence
doesn'
On Tue, 2020-07-07 at 19:48 +0200, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote:
> It seems that "terrace buildings" is used to describe both collection
> of individual buildings
> and to large building, so maybe both tagging methods are applicable.
>
> So far all cases that I found are better described as
I settled on using building:part=house for the individual houses and
wrapping the whole building with building=terrace. I think this makes more
sense anyway, tagging the individual houses as part of the larger building.
Thanks for pointing me to building:part=*!
In general, how should one appr
> I'm also, in a more general sense, raising a question about the
> established conventions and whether it makes sense to be tagging the
> individual units as "buildings", when they are not really buildings
> in and of themselves, but sections of one larger building that
> contains several other un
On Mon, 2020-07-06 at 13:40 -0700, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
> According to the wiki page about building=terrace, it is usually best
> practice to map each house as a separate area (closed way) object.
>
> "A more detailed and recommended alternative is to map each dwelling
> separately using build
Hello. I am mapping a housing development that has a few terrace
buildings that each have several town homes that share walls. From what
I've gathered from the wiki, you can either:
1. Draw a way around the whole building and tag it with
building=terrace, and then add entrance nodes with addresses
On May 25, 2020 15:35:44 Jack Armstrong wrote:
I agree with Mateusz Konieczny. If there is some vestige of the object
remaining, then mapping it in some way seems reasonable. But, if the
railway, building, highway, etc., are completely removed and there are
absolutely no visible remains of wha
There are certain residential areas where there are designated parking spots,
either for individuals or guests, that are accessible from a road, but are not
necessarily a "parking lot" where it would make sense to have a service road go
through it. Here is an example:
https://www.openstreetmap.
15 matches
Mail list logo
