Re: [Tagging] Signification of designated word

2011-01-07 Thread Rodolphe Quiedeville
Le 07/01/2011 16:05, Nathan Edgars II a écrit : > On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Richard Mann > wrote: >> Ah - now I understand it a bit better - you mean a pick-up location. >> More a kind of bus stop for carpoolers. On that model I'd probably go >> for highway=carpool on a node. > > Not reall

Re: [Tagging] Signification of designated word

2011-01-07 Thread Rodolphe Quiedeville
Le 07/01/2011 15:41, Richard Mann a écrit : > On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Rodolphe Quiedeville > wrote: >> The problem is the acess is NOT exclusive, and I want to choose the >> clearest key/value. It's easy to indicate what is exclusive but not so >> easy to ex

Re: [Tagging] Signification of designated word

2011-01-07 Thread Rodolphe Quiedeville
Le 07/01/2011 15:01, Richard Mann a écrit : > The meaning and use of "designated" is confused and highly contested > in OSM, so I'd avoid using it for any other purpose. Thanks for that point. > I'd have said "carpool" ought to be a distinct value, not a key, if > you've got exclusive parking. So

[Tagging] Signification of designated word

2011-01-07 Thread Rodolphe Quiedeville
Hi, I began a process to define a new key for carpooling that you can found at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Carpool After some discussion my vision was modified and now I think that something like carpool=designated could be better, but before modify the proposal I need so

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Carpool

2010-11-14 Thread Rodolphe Quiedeville
Le 14/11/2010 22:16, j...@jfeldredge.com a écrit : > What I am visualizing is a parking lot, perhaps government-owned, where only > those who are currently car-pooling are allowed to park. Others would be > allowed to enter to drop off or pick up passengers there, but not to park > there. I do

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Carpool

2010-11-14 Thread Rodolphe Quiedeville
Le 14/11/2010 20:33, j...@jfeldredge.com a écrit : > If, however, a parking lot were to be restricted for car-pooling use only, it > would be reasonable to tag it as access=carpool or access=carpooling. Why do you make a relation between carpooling and access limitation ? The carpooling utilizati

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Carpool

2010-11-14 Thread Rodolphe Quiedeville
Le 14/11/2010 12:15, Nathan Edgars II a écrit : > On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 6:08 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer > wrote: >> 2010/11/13 John Smith : >>> On 13 November 2010 21:38, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer >>> wrote: access no is completely wrong IMHO, better might be access=private, which also might

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Carpool

2010-11-14 Thread Rodolphe Quiedeville
Le 13/11/2010 12:38, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer a écrit : > 2010/11/13 Paul Norman : >>> Hi, >>> >>> I propose a to add parking=carpool for carpooling. >>> >>> I'm not english so please be kind with my bad grammar, I do my best and >>> be happy if you fix the mistake in the wiki. >>> >>> http://wiki.opens

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Carpool

2010-11-12 Thread Rodolphe Quiedeville
Hi, I propose a to add parking=carpool for carpooling. I'm not english so please be kind with my bad grammar, I do my best and be happy if you fix the mistake in the wiki. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Carpool Regards, -- Rodolphe Quiédeville - Artisan Logiciel Libre Tr

Re: [Tagging] I started a draft on a new "main" key culture

2010-11-08 Thread Rodolphe Quiedeville
Le 07/11/2010 13:24, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer a écrit : > I would like to invite you to take part in the discussion for a new > key "culture". > The first draft is here: > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/culture > > the discussion should mainly take place on the mailing list IMH

Re: [Tagging] emergency=fire_hydrant

2010-10-19 Thread Rodolphe Quiedeville
Le 19/10/2010 10:17, Rodolphe Quiedeville a écrit : > Le 19/10/2010 02:40, Ulf Lamping a écrit : [...] Revert done. -- Rodolphe Quiédeville - Artisan Logiciel Libre Travailleur indépendant spécialisé en logiciel libre http://rodolphe.quiedeville.org/ SIP/XMPP : rodol...@quiedeville.

Re: [Tagging] emergency=fire_hydrant

2010-10-19 Thread Rodolphe Quiedeville
Le 19/10/2010 02:40, Ulf Lamping a écrit : > Am 18.10.2010 12:20, schrieb Rodolphe Quiedeville: >> Le 18/10/2010 09:31, Rodolphe Quiedeville a écrit : >>> Hi, >>> >>> I started rename amenity=fire_hydrant to emergency=fire_hydrant as it is >>> describ

Re: [Tagging] emergency=fire_hydrant

2010-10-19 Thread Rodolphe Quiedeville
Le 19/10/2010 01:37, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer a écrit : > 2010/10/18 Rodolphe Quiedeville : >> Le 18/10/2010 09:31, Rodolphe Quiedeville a écrit : >>> I started rename amenity=fire_hydrant to emergency=fire_hydrant as it is >>> describe in the wiki. I checked there'

Re: [Tagging] emergency=fire_hydrant

2010-10-19 Thread Rodolphe Quiedeville
Le 19/10/2010 02:40, Ulf Lamping a écrit : > Am 18.10.2010 12:20, schrieb Rodolphe Quiedeville: >> Le 18/10/2010 09:31, Rodolphe Quiedeville a écrit : >>> Hi, >>> >>> I started rename amenity=fire_hydrant to emergency=fire_hydrant as it is >>> describ

Re: [Tagging] emergency=fire_hydrant

2010-10-18 Thread Rodolphe Quiedeville
Le 18/10/2010 09:31, Rodolphe Quiedeville a écrit : > Hi, > > I started rename amenity=fire_hydrant to emergency=fire_hydrant as it is > describe in the wiki. I checked there's no rendering in mapnik styles > and t...@h. [...] I forgot to say that I've opened a ticke

[Tagging] emergency=fire_hydrant

2010-10-18 Thread Rodolphe Quiedeville
Hi, I started rename amenity=fire_hydrant to emergency=fire_hydrant as it is describe in the wiki. I checked there's no rendering in mapnik styles and t...@h. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:amenity%3Dfire_hydrant&redirect=no http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features#Em