Re: [Tagging] Another classification needed for minor urban/suburban collectors?

2010-08-23 Thread Kevin Atkinson
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Nathan Edgars II wrote: Also how are you identifying the function of the roads. Is it just local knowledge? Or are you using some official documents? Mostly local knowledge for the more major roads, plus physical characteristics for the minor collectors (for example, they

Re: [Tagging] Another classification needed for minor urban/suburban collectors?

2010-08-23 Thread Kevin Atkinson
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Nathan Edgars II wrote: On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 4:41 AM, Kevin Atkinson wrote: If you help me to find the roads mentioned I might be able to give you a little better advice. What do you mean by "find the roads mentioned"? I assume what you gave are st

Re: [Tagging] Another classification needed for minor urban/suburban collectors?

2010-08-23 Thread Kevin Atkinson
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Nathan Edgars II wrote: I'm going to use this area of Orlando as an example: http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=28.51724&lon=-81.43253&zoom=15&layers=M I designated only the major through highways as primary, and major suburban highways as secondary. Yet there are still two

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Directional Prefix & Suffix Indication

2010-08-22 Thread Kevin Atkinson
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Directional_Prefix_%26_Suffix_Indication Tags to mark directionals which are more part of an address than the street name. Since this has been discusses extensivly on the talk-us page, I might start the voting process early if I don't get