Well, here's an example of how I dealt with US-19 Truck over here in Pittsburgh
were it isn't signed on I-279 or I-376 except inside of the I-376 exit 69 mess
on the south side of the Fort Pitt Tunnels.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/571349 (signed)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relati
important to me that I get this as correct as possible, because I
can't have iD overwriting somebody's valid lane tagging. I'd like to be able
to show visually what a tag like `none;slight_right` means on the ground.
Thanks, Bryan
[1] https://www.mapbox.com/blog/osm-gsoc-i
I honestly think Mapbox needs to stop immediately editing ways that they think
are invalid. I've seen several ways that I've work hard on, know are valid,
and are being damaged by edits. The 'NONE' tag in turn lanes is COMPLETELY
VALID
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/rickmastfan67/diar
I'm just curious, but what does everybody think about the 'covered=yes' tag
when used on highways? I know you aren't suppose to use it when the highway
goes under a bridge, but I've been noticing more people adding the tag in that
case, even though the Wiki page on that tag says you shouldn't.
Well, in the US, I've just been tagging the 'ramp' speeds (
https://goo.gl/maps/Bw8Is ) as a normal 'maxspeed'. I know several other users
here in the US have been doing it the same way.
However, I wouldn't be opposed if we wanted to tag them as 'maxspeed:ramp=35
mph', but only if we could get
Here's how we have done this in the Pittsburgh, PA area where the 'light rail'
line shares the pavement with the normal road lanes. They normally only use
this line during the rush hours unless they have
to close the tunnel @ Station Square and divert the light rail traffic
along this route.
r ways to tag things in a consistent
manner (most glaringly, a mass retag of all US highways as trunk instead of
primary, even when undivided).
On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 8:15 PM, James Mast wrote:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:centre_turn_lane
?
This is what I've been using.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:centre_turn_lane
?
This is what I've been using.
-James
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2014 18:11:11 -0500
From: ba...@ursamundi.org
To: tagging@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Center Turn Lane Tagging?
lanes:both_ways=1turn:lanes:both_ways=left
On Sat, Jul
But what if the pole has both telephone and power on it? ;) That's what's
common here in my neighborhood. I can look out my front door and see a pole
with both of them using it.
-James
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 17:05:38 +0200
From: francois.laco...@telecom-bretagne.eu
To: tagging@openstreetmap.o
> Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 23:35:45 +0200
> From: pier...@gmail.com
> To: tagging@openstreetmap.org
> Subject: Re: [Tagging] Micro mapping traffic signals
>
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 11:22 PM, Vincent de Château-Thierry
> wrote:
>
> > This only deals with single traffic light mapping and will no
Why wouldn't something like a node tagged "highway:forward=give_way" work?
-James ___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 23:50:42 +0100
From: osm...@gmail.com
To: tagging@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Tagging] exit_to on motorway_junction
> b. no solution of the exit_to_left yet to support both branches There is a
> solution in the form of this proposal that I made awhile ago that nobody
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 08:57:01 -0600
From: ba...@ursamundi.org
To: tagging@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Stop sign?
> Are there examples of traffic signals that don't control all the ways they're
> located? With stop signs, typical application only applies to one or two of
> the in
> Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 16:26:11 -0400
> From: nice...@att.net
> To: tagging@openstreetmap.org
> Subject: Re: [Tagging] Tag ref on motorway_link
>
> On 10/23/2012 4:10 PM, Johan C wrote:
> > c) it quite often will be impossible for any (present/future) routing
> > engine to always predict the ri
> Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 14:49:57 +0900
> From: erringt...@gmail.com
> To: tagging@openstreetmap.org
> Subject: Re: [Tagging] Tag ref on motorway_link
>
> > Richard didn't say he uses that key *because* it's not rendered; he
> > uses it because it makes sense. The fact that it's not rendered on
Gauß has now also added a new section called "More turn restrictions" with a
ton of new restrictions that none of the editors support. Heck, I don't think
any routers support them as well. All these new turn restrictions deal with
"half" turns.. Maybe Gauß needs a time out on editing that pa
Is it just me, or has all the edits Gauß has recently done to the Turn
Restrictions page on the Wiki made it more confusing for new mappers?
Especially with the new "Combination of restrictions" section. What does
everybody else think?http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction
I would love to see a bot run after the database officially was declared odbl
to delete them and the odbl:note tags. ___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
> Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 08:10:43 +0900
> From: a.erring...@lancaster.ac.uk
> To: tagging@openstreetmap.org
> Subject: Re: [Tagging] rest_area and service road
>
> On Thu, September 29, 2011 04:08, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
> > On 9/28/2011 3:04 PM, Pieren wrote:
> >
> >> What is our recommendation
Eugene, you should also mark your ticket on the trac as invalid (or something
else) because of this.http://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/3873 Don't want them
to make a change to the rendering by accident. ;) -- James
> Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2011 08:13:40 +0800
> From: sea...@gmail.com
> To: tagging@
> Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2011 13:11:17 +0200
> From: dieterdre...@gmail.com
> To: tagging@openstreetmap.org
> Subject: Re: [Tagging] service=drive-through or drive_through?
>
> There is many more of them. I propose to use
> service=drive-through
I agree with this. Maybe we should do one "final" v
All I know is that "service=drive-through" was rendered already in Mapnik while
"service=drive_through" is not. Look here:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=40.525952&lon=-80.006203&zoom=18&layers=M I
had originally tagged the "Drive Thru's" for Taco Bell and Arby's here as
"service=drive-thro
I'm just wondering, is there a general consensus on how to tag maxheight in
"Feed & Inches"? I've looked at the taginfo and noticed several different ways
people have been doing it.
14'1" / 14'-1" / 14' 1" / 14ft1in
I just wanted some opinions before I tagged some of US-19 in WV that has some
ope I have answered your question fully. If not, please let me know.
-- James
To: tagging@openstreetmap.org
From: da...@debian.org
Date: Sun, 22 May 2011 09:28:40 +0200
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - highway=motorway_junction
Tagging Extension
On Sun, 22 May 2011 02:3
I've created a proposal for an extension of the sub-tags (ref=* and exit_to=*)
of highway=motorway_junction.
This is to help people on tagging highway ramps that split farther down after
they leave the main highway. It will also help deal with other motorways
splitting off of the main motorw
Well, I'm working up an official proposal for this right now. Will updating
this thread and also send out a RFC once it's done. ;)
-- James
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.open
Alright, if anybody had been following this, but just didn't want to comment,
now's your chance.
I have added the relations for the restrictions.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/8189558
I-279 - 9 relations (4 mainline; 5 ramps)
I-579 - 4 relations (all mainline since no separate
I was just thinking, here in the USA, we sometimes have exit ramps that after
they split from the main highway, split again (sometimes with separate exit
#'s). One such example would be Exit #1B-1C (old #7A-7B) on I-279 here in
Pittsburgh, PA.
(Google StreetView examples from when the exits
I was just about to create some new relations for the I-279/I-579 HOV lanes to
reflect the times that they are open and closed.
http://www.dot.state.pa.us/penndot/districts/district11.nsf/traffic_HOV_hours?OpenForm
That shows the current times when they are open and when Outbound is restricte
penstreetmap.org
From: ba...@ursamundi.org
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 11:11:25 -0500
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Traffic Lights, but only for one direction on a highway
that isn't divided
On 04/13/2011 12:45 AM, James Mast wrote:
> So does anybody have any suggestions on how to deal with something like
> highway that isn't divided
> To: tagging@openstreetmap.org
> CC: rickmastfa...@hotmail.com
>
> On 13 April 2011 17:06, James Mast wrote:
> > Not the same situation here NE2. There are no traffic lights at
> > all installed in either place for the inbound direction
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Traffic Lights, but only for one direction on a
> highway that isn't divided
>
> On 4/13/2011 1:45 AM, James Mast wrote:
> > So does anybody have any suggestions on how to deal with something like
> > this? Here's my example:
> >
>
So does anybody have any suggestions on how to deal with something like this?
Here's my example:
Here in Pittsburgh, when you're coming off I-579 going towards the South Hills
across the Liberty Bridge, you encounter two sets of traffic lights (one before
you get onto the bridge, and one on
I've personally heard "Contraflow" mentioned for the switchover's some DOT's
have on Interstates for Hurricane (or other) evacuations in the press. I know
I-95 in Georgia happens to have two such crossovers, but they don't
specifically say "contraflow" on the signs. Here are links to how they
; From: nerou...@gmail.com
> To: tagging@openstreetmap.org
> Subject: Re: [Tagging] Counterflow Lanes
>
> On 2/18/2011 5:00 AM, James Mast wrote:
> > Alright, I've tagged the roadway that I was asking this about with the
> > following:
> > lanes=3
> > lane
Alright, I've tagged the roadway that I was asking this about with the
following:
lanes=3
lanes:counterflow=center
That should work "for now".
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/24873632
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
h
I'm just curious here, but is there a general consensus on how to tag roads
that have 3+ lanes that have 1 or more lanes that change direction at certain
times while still leaving at least one lane going in each direction? You know,
kinda like the Lions Gate Bridge
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wi
> Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 11:06:48 -0500
> From: nerou...@gmail.com
> To: tagging@openstreetmap.org
> Subject: Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Emergency Traffic Signals
>
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 12:33 AM, James Mast
> wrote:
> > I've created a propos
>On 13 January 2011 16:10, Paul Johnson wrote:
>> On 01/12/2011 11:33 PM, James Mast wrote:
>>> I've created a proposal for Emergency Traffic Signals, which are
>>> typically found in front of fire stations and highway tunnels at
>>> http://wiki
I've created a proposal for Emergency Traffic Signals, which are typically
found in front of fire stations and highway tunnels at
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Emergency_Traffic_Signals
-- James ___
> Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 18:16:46 +0100
> From: dieterdre...@gmail.com
> To: tagging@openstreetmap.org
> Subject: Re: [Tagging] Combo Weight Bridges
>
> 2011/1/12 Martin Simon :
> > These signs are refering to "military load class" ("militärische
> > Lastenklasse"), not to maxweight.
> > Other th
Alright, I have a small bridge locally that has a duel weight limits on it.
One for normal and one combo. This is the bridge in question:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/69968204
The sign goes as follows: (I can also provide a picture of it later if it's
needed)
BRIDGE
=
WEIGHT
LIM
42 matches
Mail list logo
