Sorry, forgot the link
[0]
https://www.germany.travel/en/experience-enjoy/german-bread-and-baked-goods.html
On 10.05.24 11:10, Hauke Stieler wrote:
Hi,
I'm with some other folks here: Tagging specific types of bread seems
not a good idea. At least in Germany there are a lot of diff
Hi,
I'm with some other folks here: Tagging specific types of bread seems
not a good idea. At least in Germany there are a lot of different types
[0], bakeries change their offers every few months and many larger
bakeries have like ten or twenty types of bread. Also, some bakeries
give names
:59 CET schrieb Joseph Eisenberg:
> Yes, amenity=art_school appears to be the most common way to map places
> that offer training in the visual arts.
>
> — Joseph Eisenberg
>
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 4:06 PM Shawn K. Quinn wrote:
> > On 12/8/20 16:12, Hauke
Hi,
today I encountered a drawing/painting school [0] that offers workshops and
classes for children and adults. Is there a tag for these schools? I haven't
found any, so how about establishing amenity=painting_school (or
=drawing_school?) analogous to amenity=music_school. Any thoughts on that
Hi,
the wiki [0] said for the tag "bicycle_parking=stands":
"Use this tag for non-rectangular stands as well (e.g. round ones, fancy
artistic ones, long ones allowing to attach more than two vehicles). "
Sounds to me like your O-shaped frame is a stand. I also already mapped
frames similar to th
Hi,
I would create a multipolygon for that. Wetland is something different
than a lake/pond.
For wetland the wiki says, that wetland areas contain "characteristic
vegetation that is adapted to its unique soil conditions" [0]. A lake
obviously doesn't (at least no land-vegetation like grass and bu
Hi,
sometimes people just use boxes or the basket of an old bicycle for food
sharing purposes. Because they are usually not inside a building or
something, I would add the "covered=*" tag to your list.
I also would use the "contact:*" keys (for the website, facebook, other
social media channels,
Hi,
> I too prefer 'fixed'.
>
> Foldable, is also in some sense irremovable/unremovable (spell check objects)
> where as I think 'fixed' is a better description as it implies not foldable,
> removeable nor lowerable.
I was starting to write a whole page why I don't like "fixed" instead of
"un
Hi all,
thanks for all the feedback and voting. The proposal for tax free
shopping and the "duty_free" tag has been approved: 13 votes, 2 against,
1 abstain.
Currently there's a discussion ongoing about the calculation when there
are "abstain" votes. So here are some approval calculations all lea
I don't have real data to check your statement (except the mapped
bollards in OSM) but personally I don't know if that's true for all
regions. I personally have the feeling that the amount is at least equal
and in Hamburg, Germany I have the impression that more bollars are
removable then unremovab
Hi all,
there's the "bollard" key with documented value "rising" and "removable"
[0] but I often encounter also bollards which cannot be removed easily.
I would love to see the "unremovable" value in the documentation. Should
I open a proposal page for this one value? That sounds a bit of an
overk
Hi,
I have some feedback for you:
1.)
I'm not a native English spearker and personally never heard of "in-kind
donations" before, so maybe a short description/definition might be
needed/helpful.
2.)
According to [0] the convention for separation word in a key is the
underscore. So I would change
Hi,
just a reminder that voting ends on Saturday ;)
Hauke
On 28.01.20 21:38, Hauke Stieler wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I finally set the status to "voting" of the tax-free proposal. This ends
> on 2020-02-15 (a bit more than two weeks).
>
> https://wiki.openstreetma
Hi everyone,
I finally set the status to "voting" of the tax-free proposal. This ends
on 2020-02-15 (a bit more than two weeks).
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/tax_free_shopping
Thanks for all the feedback and happy voting.
Hauke
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digi
Sorry for the possible confusion:
All the things you said sound still fine and logic to me, but the user
"marc_marc_irc" made a good point: We only need three values for
"duty_free=*": yes, no and refund.
What do you think of a scheme where we say:
* duty_free=yes
Travelers exporting things don'
> if you dislike duty_free=limited, maybe duty_free=refund
> is more understandable
I had the idea of "duty_free=" before, but it changed to
the current scheme with "duty_free:refund=*" during the discussion.
However, I can definitely imagine going back to
"duty_free=" with the additional tags
"d
rally pay no taxes would be
tagged with "duty_free=yes" and optionally with "duty_free:refund=no".
I hope this also makes sense to you.
On 17.01.20 12:27, marc marc wrote:
> Le 17.01.20 à 01:32, Hauke Stieler a écrit :
>>> I see 3 levels :
>>> the customer do
I understand your point and it sound logically to me. Your idea of also
specifying more general tags doesn't change that much in the tags, just
their meaning.
As this is the more OSM-like way (as you said), I'll edit the wiki page
accordingly.
Thanks for the hint :)
On 17.01.20 09:08, Mateusz Ko
> I see 3 levels :
> the customer doesn't pay the tax duty_free=yes
> the customer pay the tax but the shop help for a refund
> the customer pay the tax and the shop doesn't help a refund duty_free=no
Exactly, this is the basic idea for the scheme (added these points to
the wiki page). There might
Hi,
> about : duty_free:refund=yes
> is it an intermediate level between duty_free=yes and duty_free=no ?
> if yes, wouldn't it be better to use duty_free=limited ?
I wouldn't say "duty_free:refund=yes" is something in between
"duty_free=yes" and "=no" but rather a different type of duty_free-ness
;d like to start voting soon, so please
> take a look at the proposal and let me know if something needs to be
> changed.
>
> Hauke
>
> [0]
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/tax_free_shopping
>
> On 04.01.20 19:47, Hauke Sti
rg/wiki/Proposed_features/tax_free_shopping
On 04.01.20 19:47, Hauke Stieler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> you may noticed the discussion "Tag for 'tax free shopping'" on this
> mailing list. This is the proposal for the new "duty_free" tag.
>
> https://wiki.openstre
Hi Stuart
> I could see :
> free_water =
> free_water:container =
> free_water:table=
If something is for the general public (= anyone) the value is usually
"yes" (as at the "access" tag [0]) and then there are further
restricting values (when there's a "yes" there's mostly at least also a
"no"
Hi Stuart,
> The proposal below does not seem optimal, but if that is what is decided
> we will write wiki instructions in this manner.
No decisions have been made so far. Currently all these mails just
contain ideas and discussions.
I'm personally a fan of the namespace scheme, the one with the
Hi,
> This model is used for many other tags in OSM. One of the most
> fundamental tags, access=*, uses it to show "access only for customers"
> for example.
> See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Dcustomers .
> free_water=customers would not look out of place at all in that list.
Hi,
I think he misspelled it in the email. The tag page is in British
English [0] and the American English tag "conference_center" has only
been used 44 times.
The word "conference_center" does not appear on the "2.x" branch of iD.
However the documented British English value "conference_centre"
Hi,
I also came along those boxes and love the idea to have a separate tag
for them.
Just some small things:
- There should be an icon on the map. Maybe something like the
shop=charity icon [0] but with a box? Just an idea.
- I think a German "Umsonstladen" is more like a store and less like a
> I could sort of understand if a business name was an emoji, rather than
> real words, but I'm not aware of any cases of this?
But I would tag a pure emoji-name of a company using the normal "name"
key. However I'm also not aware of any case.
Hauke
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital s
Hi all,
there was already some feedback (here and on the discussion page) thanks
for that :)
Considering the feedback, I edited the wiki page, adjusted the tagging
scheme and added some examples for tagging situations.
Hauke
On 04.01.20 19:47, Hauke Stieler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> you ma
Hi,
> Absence of such facilities surely applies to 99.% of shops.
>
> Nobody is going to want to start to tag the absence of such a service?
Of course nobody would start to do that, but when having "=yes", then I
think there should be a "=no" (even though this is the default case).
And whe
Hi,
> I don't think it can be phrased that way. As for the VAT in the EU,
> everybody who proves that the goods were exported is eligible for a tax
> refund.
you're right, maybe saying that "this shop does not offer any service
(prepared forms, memberships in organizations, etc.) for an
tax-exemp
Hi Martin,
> actually tax collection and exemption are not specifically related to
> airports, although airports are a typical setting where duty free shops
> occur, there are also different places where you can find them, so this
> should be phrased more generically.
I always use "e.g." or "f
Hi,
you may noticed the discussion "Tag for 'tax free shopping'" on this
mailing list. This is the proposal for the new "duty_free" tag.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/tax_free_shopping
Basically the new tag has three values:
* yes:
This shop does not collect taxes at all
Hi,
> Which OSM data consumer?
I personally thought of tourists wanting to buy stuff. As you mentioned,
a EU-tourist has no benefit of this duty-free-information, but I also
think of tourists (from) outside the EU.
As a use case: I think of the OsmAnd app filtering for duty-free-shops
where touris
Hi,
> In terms of tagging, the scenario described could be something like
> duty_free=export - meaning YES if you are exporting it beyond the
> customs union area (~~EU), otherwise NO.
But isn't this always and everywhere the case (as Jarek mentioned before
me)?
My idea of the duty_free tag was
Hi,
that's true, the EU is one special case here. But would the status of a
traveler influence the tagging schema of "duty_free=*" in your opinion?
Hauke
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreet
Hi Javbw,
so you suggest only a "duty_free=" key with the values "yes|no|designated"?
I like your idea of having only one key "duty_free" but I would choose
different values. The tags "duty_free=yes" vs. "=designated" might be
confusing.
My idea:
duty_free=yes
E.g. Shop in international
On 20.12.19 14:59, Hauke Stieler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I recently found several stores (pharmacy, clothing store, jewelery and
> others) which offer "tax free shopping". For those of you who don't know
> it, this works as follows:
>
> You buy something and
l
On 20.12.19 23:14, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 21 Dec 2019 at 00:02, Hauke Stieler <mailto:m...@hauke-stieler.de>> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I recently found several stores (pharmacy, clothing store, jewelery and
> others) which offer &qu
x_refund=" or "tax_free=" (for shops at the
airport where you don't pay any taxes).
Greetings
Hauke (aka hauke-stieler)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
40 matches
Mail list logo
