Re: [Tagging] Game and toy library

I'm just letting you guys know that I will unsubscribe from the mailing list because I get notified too frequently on my phone of new emails and I am not involved enough in OSM at the moment to engage in other subjects than the one I started. Please forward the discussion on the wiki page:https

Re: [Tagging] Game and toy library

I made some changes again. Mainly I changed "rental" to "loan" even though loan doesn't exist, because they have a quite different meaning: https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/rent https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/loan and I changed the age tags to account for a comment in the proposal's discussion pag

Re: [Tagging] Game and toy library

Thanks but this has already been taken care of in the proposal page. I don't see why you're pointing that out now.___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Game and toy library

I made some updates. Feedback appreciated.___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Game and toy library

ood, we can just use that. > On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 10:57 PM Paul Allen wrote: > >> On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 2:29 PM ChameleonScales >> wrote: >> >>> Also I'd like to upload a proposed svg icon but apparently I don't have >>> permission to upload

Re: [Tagging] Game and toy library

Also I discussed with a senior toy and game library owner and she says "toy library" is better even if it doesn't include "game" because it's a more established name. So how can I change the url of my proposal to toy_library instead of toy_and_game_library?__

Re: [Tagging] Game and toy library

Yeah actually I'm still working on it. I'd like them to have tags for whether they can lend or not and what public is targeted (children or all ages). When I travel and look for a board game to rent I don't want to end up in a child care center with no adult games. Also I'd like to upload a prop

Re: [Tagging] Game and toy library

com> wrote: > Took me a while to find it .. to save otehrs time here is a link. > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/toy_and_game_library > > Proposals are usually discussed both here and on their own discussion page. > > On 11/10/18 20:27, ChameleonSca

Re: [Tagging] Game and toy library

I made some updates to the wiki proposal and I propose we continue the discussion on its discussion page. ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Tuesday, October 9, 2018 11:23 PM, ChameleonScales wrote: > Hi all, > > Game and toy libraries don't fit in any feature type. > They c

Re: [Tagging] Game and toy library

Here's the proposal wiki page (I hope I did it correctly): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/toy_and_game_library I'll polish it tomorrow. ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Wednesday, October 10, 2018 10:12 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > sent from a phone > > > On 10. O

Re: [Tagging] Game and toy library

Just found out about the proposal process: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal_process. Should I create a wiki page and follow the steps there? ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Wednesday, October 10, 2018 4:24 PM, ChameleonScales wrote: > > --- You only send this to me (pr

Re: [Tagging] Game and toy library

=toys_and_games > > But in this case we do not want data consumers that does not > understand the library-subkey to treat a toys_and_games as a > book-library. > hence the idea to place it in the main key, as amenity=toys_and_games_library > > m. > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2

Re: [Tagging] Game and toy library

in <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 10/10/18 09:47, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: > >> On Wed, 10 Oct 2018 at 08:04, Paul Allen wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 10:24 PM ChameleonScales >>> wrote: >>> >>>> amenity:library=g

[Tagging] Game and toy library

Hi all, Game and toy libraries don't fit in any feature type. They can be but are not necessarily: - non-profit organizations - child care facilities - social faciilties - toy stores - libraries - probably other things So I think they should have their own feature type and tag. How about amenity: