Den 06.09.2016 20.56, skrev ksg:
Am 06.09.2016 um 20:38 schrieb Kevin Kenny :
OK, that sounds good as well. Maybe still have some sort of tagging for the
type so that we can show a letterbox as Mr Díaz de Argandoña requests?
Perfect, may be like "summit:register:letterbox=yes“?
(As I said ea
Off topic:
In my opinion, that's how *all* access tags should have been. It's incredibly
many who don't know that bicycle=yes/no/whatever is an access tag and not a
"route choice opinion" or something like that. So they put bicycle=no if they
don't think it fits their commute bike...
Access:bic
Den 27. mars 2016 21.36.01 CEST, skrev Martin Koppenhoefer
:
>
>
>sent from a phone
>
>> Am 27.03.2016 um 21:16 schrieb Anders Fougner
>:
>>
>> Did you already consider a fuzzy tag (such as fuzzy=yes or
>boundary_fuzzy=yes)?
>
>
>that's a
>I agree using polygons is far superior to nodes. The question I'm
>raising
>is do these fuzzy areas belong in OSM. Using my example for the
>Cascadia
>(Independence Area) a polygon with the boundary could be used to search
>for
>features in the OSM database.
>
>Clifford
Did you already consider
Den 27. mars 2016 19.00.18 CEST, skrev Mateusz Konieczny :
>On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 09:50:21 -0700
>Clifford Snow wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 9:18 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
>> > > wrote:
>>
>> > I agree that a rough polygon seems better than a node because it
>> > allows to estimate the size
Den 18.02.2016 12.21, skrev Martin Koppenhoefer:
"When the structure is made from steel or concrete, it is not a tower,
it could be a mast though" (maybe not the best example).
yes, clearly not the best example ;-)
It's quite obvious that "steel and concrete" can be safely removed
fr
ers.foug...@gmail.com
+47 97158863
Sent from my Commodore 64
Den 29. januar 2016 17.34.00 CET, skrev Mike Thompson :
>On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 2:47 AM, Tom Pfeifer
>wrote:
>
>> Anders Fougner wrote on 2016/01/29 10:06:
>>
>>> Den 29.01.2016 02.21, skrev Mike Thompson
Den 29.01.2016 15.19, skrev Chris Hill:
On 29/01/16 10:17, Anders Fougner wrote:
Den 29.01.2016 10.47, skrev Tom Pfeifer:
Den 29.01.2016 02.21, skrev Mike Thompson:
What one person may aid, another may free (I am using "free
climbing" in the US sense [1]).
> [1] https://en.
Den 29.01.2016 10.47, skrev Tom Pfeifer:
Den 29.01.2016 02.21, skrev Mike Thompson:
What one person may aid, another may free (I am using "free
climbing" in the US sense [1]).
> [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_climbing
that wikipedia page is quite messed up by an recent edit war about
Den 29.01.2016 02.21, skrev Mike Thompson:
> Need rating (difficulty) tag for aid climbing[5]
Should not be difficult:
Climbing styles
climbing:aided=[yes|no]
climbing:grade:aided:[min|max|mean]=*
or so.
What one person may aid, another may free (I am using "free c
We already have something similar in
amenity=parking
hiking=yes
ski=yes
in order to indicate that a parking is mostly used for people who go
hiking and/or skiing.
I.e. not for parking of boots and skis...
In other words, if you use bicycle=yes it may not be obvious whether it is:
* a bi
Den 31.08.15 12.41, skrev moltonel 3x Combo:
On 31/08/2015, Christoph Hormann wrote:
I would be careful here - 'dirt' is essentially a very vague term which
probably originates from the concept of 'dirt roads' here. 'Soil' in
the other hand is fairly precise, see
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki
Den 28.08.15 16.56, skrev Mateusz Konieczny:
On Fri, 28 Aug 2015 14:15:56 +0200
Anders Fougner wrote:
So we should consider replacing the tagging scheme with one which
isn't misunderstood so easily.
The use of access:foot=*, access:bicycle=* has been proposed at
<http://wiki.openstree
Den 28.08.15 14.41, skrev Andy Townsend:
On 28/08/2015 13:15, Anders Fougner wrote:
So we should consider replacing the tagging scheme with one which
isn't misunderstood so easily.
The use of access:foot=*, access:bicycle=* has been proposed at
<http://wiki.openstreetmap.
Hi,
as probably most of you are aware of, common access tags such as foot=*,
bicycle=* etc. are every often misunderstood by the people contributing
to OSM. The problem is that people, unless they have read the wiki,
believe that these tags define whether it is _possible_ to walk or cycle
alon
15 matches
Mail list logo
