Re: [Tagging] opening_hours for public transport routes?

2017-11-13 1:51 GMT+01:00 Albert Pundt : > Is it common practice to represent the starts/ends of public transport > route schedules with the opening_hours tag? For example, Red Rose Transit > Route 1 in Lancaster, PA uses this >

Re: [Tagging] Emergency phones with blinking lights

2017-11-02 19:27 GMT+01:00 marc marc : > > Le 02. 11. 17 à 19:15, Éric Gillet a écrit : > > light:blinking=yes > > light:blinking doesn't exist yet. > so maybe it's better to use this one > light:flash=yes (80 uses) > Didn't find this one, but s

Re: [Tagging] Emergency phones with blinking lights

2017-11-02 15:50 GMT+01:00 Nelson A. de Oliveira : > Is there a way to represent emergency phones (emergency=phone) which > have a blinking/flashing light (so they can be identified at night, > with fog, etc), please? > Maybe you can reuse the lit=yes tag. It's not exactly the original meaning of

Re: [Tagging] New OSM Quick-Fix service

2017-10-13 23:25 GMT+02:00 Yuri Astrakhan : > I would like to introduce a new quick-fix editing service. It allows > users to generate a list of editing suggestions using a query, review each > suggestion one by one, and click "Save" on each change if they think it's a > good edit. > > For exampl

Re: [Tagging] zero waste

2017-01-17 17:01 GMT+01:00 Martin Koppenhoefer : > > > On 17 Jan 2017, at 13:50, Greg Troxel wrote: > > > > certification:zero-waste.org=yes > > > +1 +1 ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Public transport cards

2017-01-17 11:51 GMT+01:00 Marc Zoutendijk : > > Op 17 jan. 2017, om 11:02 heeft Martin Koppenhoefer < > dieterdre...@gmail.com> het volgende geschreven: > > > 2017-01-17 8:47 GMT+01:00 Tijmen Stam : > >> However, I would warn against using OSM as a database for public >> transport. It seems as if

Re: [Tagging] shop=estate_agent and office=estate_agent

2016-12-08 11:25 GMT+01:00 Martin Koppenhoefer : > > On 8 Dec 2016, at 01:49, Mike N wrote: > > > > Like all things in OSM, I'm not sure how to migrate to a new consensus > of office= > > > just use office, and add a hint to the wiki. As was pointed out above, > actual migration has already taken

Re: [Tagging] Discarding converted_by

2016-09-23 5:06 GMT+02:00 Nelson A. de Oliveira : > Do we have any need for "converted_by" > https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/converted_by#values or it could > be discarded while modifying an object, exactly what we already do > with "created_by" and some other tags? (ie, we won't mass remov

Re: [Tagging] Abusing name tags on type=route

2016-09-18 19:44 GMT+02:00 Mike N : > On 9/18/2016 11:28 AM, Craig Wallace wrote: > >> use the "note" key >>> >> >> Or the "description" key, if it is something that may be useful for the >> end user, ie displaying in an app. >> > > Neither note nor description display when browsing an OSM change

Re: [Tagging] Minibus routes

2016-09-08 9:19 GMT+02:00 Martin Koppenhoefer : > > > - Are those built/maintained by the bus company or a related contractor ? > > it doesn't matter who builds or maintains the bus stop, the important > thing is that the bus stops there. There could be a contractor building and > maintaining them,

Re: [Tagging] Minibus routes

2016-09-08 3:30 GMT+02:00 Michael Tsang : > On some minibus routes, there are platforms (i.e. poles placed near the > road) > along the route but they are just for the convenience of the passengers. > However, in most of the cases, these platforms have no legal effect and > passengers can actually

Re: [Tagging] Minibus routes

2016-09-07 18:23 GMT+02:00 Michael Tsang : > Minibuses have fixed route but not fixed stops (i.e. you can catch it > anywhere > along the route). When I map those routes, should I put in the platforms > and > route without putting in any stop position? > If there are platforms (marks on the groun

Re: [Tagging] bus route with reversing

2016-09-02 23:55 GMT+02:00 Jo : > I'm not adding stop_position nodes to the route relations either, but > that's a personal preference to keep things simple. Platform nodes for the > stops are enough to describe the sequence order of the stops. > I think stop_positions are more important as these

Re: [Tagging] Bus bays

The bus direction can be determined by routing software using the ways present in a type=route relation, assuming they ordered. 2016-08-28 16:15 GMT+02:00 Michael Tsang : > Dear all, > > What is the commonly-used practice to denote if there is a bus bay at a > public_transport=stop_position and b

Re: [Tagging] For comment: proposed mechanical edit: pitlatrine=yes to toilets:disposal=pitlatrine

I agree with the proposal, good idead ! 2016-07-08 22:56 GMT+02:00 Bryce Nesbitt : > See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_edits/Bryce_C_Nesbitt > The semantics of the two tag styles are believed to be identical. > ___ Tagging mailing list Ta

Re: [Tagging] New tag

2016-06-30 6:27 GMT+02:00 Hans De Kryger : > How does everyone feel about (store_number=) for store numbers that > companies assign their stores? > Why not use ref=* ? ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/li

Re: [Tagging] Recycling Containers with opening_hours or service_times

2016-03-27 17:20 GMT+02:00 Thorsten Alge : > I was wondering about the tagging for recycling containers. In Germany > they have defined times in which it is allowed to use them to prevent > noise pollution. I believe that an amenity can be closed by "administrative" means (a set of rules for con

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - (Remove name_1 and alt_name_1 from wiki)

2016-01-26 17:52 GMT+01:00 Colin Smale : > So how ARE we going to represent multi-valued attributes from real life in > an OSM context? > I believe that if a multi-value tag system is added to the OSM API, the migration would be easier from semicolumns multi-values than from _N suffixes.

Re: [Tagging] How to tag a "Olive Oil Factory"?

Hi and welcome on OSM ! There is a proposed feature about olive oil mills on the wiki. Éric ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo

Re: [Tagging] power=* tag: minor_line vs. line

2015-10-15 11:31 GMT+02:00 Éric Gillet : > > If the height of a mountain define its importance, simply use the 'ele=*' > attribute to sort them, no need for another subjective 'importance' tag. > Sorry for typos in my previous email, I meant

Re: [Tagging] power=* tag: minor_line vs. line

> > > On Oct 15, 2015, at 4:02 AM, François Lacombe > wrote: > > > > importance=* > > That word is not allowed over in -carto github, no matter how relevant or > useful - like with mountains or regional features that need to shown at > varying z levels based on... Importance. > > In OSM, 30m tall

Re: [Tagging] new access value

Hello, I know this is not a vote or anything close, but wanted to say I don't think a ban, especially a month-long ban, was warranted by Frederik's two last messages. Maybe the problematic idiom was a bit harsh, but most of the posts contributed to the ongoing discussion. 2015-10-10 10:49 GMT+02:

Re: [Tagging] Bus route relations. Forward/backward tag

2015-02-16 13:03 GMT+01:00 fly : > There are still cases where forward/backward are useful with P2-routes. > E.g. a route with a loop and some members used twice but different > directions. > Shouldn't one just duplicate the stop_positions in the relation, and add ways twice in order, without rol

Re: [Tagging] Route relations - Forward & Backward

> > Now if it were me, I wouldn't add roles to stops either, except for those > which are only to let people off or on. But usually I add a platform role > anyway. Even though it's obvious that a node tagged with > public_transport=platform/highway=bus_stop is a platform and a way is part > of the

Re: [Tagging] Unification of google-plus links

It can be done easily with JOSM, you just need to download all nodes/ways/relations, select them all and rename the offending tags in one go. On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Andreas Neumann wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to unify the keys for google-plus-pages of objects in the > Database. In

Re: [Tagging] Bitcoin ATM (amenity=atm | currency:XBT=yes)

Maybe we should move towards a scheme more specific about accepted currencies : currency:in:USD=yes currency:out:BTC=yes For a one-way Bitcoin ATM dispensing BTC in exchange of USD, for example. On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 2:40 PM, Janko Mihelić wrote: > Maybe create a new tag that tells if the AT