I was about to list some points by which I think this proposal has great
advantages, but I'll stick to these three, where Vincent sums it up much
more elegantly than I could have written.
As it happened before and it's still happening with other schemes, we
should always try to improve the overa
On Sat, 11 Feb 2023 at 10:07, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The ‘dry swamp’ has no apparent way to tag it.
Are they also known by some other name?
I ask because I can find no papers about the phenomenon, by that name,
on Google Scholar
--
Andy Mabbett
@pigsonthewing
http://pigsonthew
>
> Anyone suggesting widespread changes such as this needs to explain how
> this proposal will help with at least one of the following:
>
> 1) Allowing new mappers to contribute to OSM easier than they
> currently can
> 2) Allowing some nuance to be captured that can't be captur
Hi,
Le lun. 13 févr. 2023 à 14:11, Andy Townsend a écrit :
> > By the way, I saw some changes leading to x10 contribution rates and be
> criticized as disrupting longstanding practices or established tagging.
>
> An actual example would be really useful here.
>
Here are some, very specific taggi
> By the way, I saw some changes leading to x10 contribution rates and
be criticized as disrupting longstanding practices or established tagging.
An actual example would be really useful here.
> Establishment nor longstanding practices shouldn't be valid reasons
on their own to justify decisio
Hello
Le ven. 10 févr. 2023 à 19:29, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <
tagging@openstreetmap.org> a écrit :
> Or to be more specific solved problems, if any, are much smaller than size
> of change of longstanding tagging practices.
>
To me, it's a return of experience matter and a debate we should