For the smart (the white car), the same rules apply as if it was
overtaking the parked cars, it may only pass once the other side is free.
The signs on the right say "no stopping", arrow to the left means "no
stopping starts here", arrow to the right means "...and ends here". They
are just the
Okay, but the data consumer won't know how you reached that decision (to
count it or not). So whoever attempts a visualization of the data will
have no idea whether to put the parking lane next to the rest of the
street or put it "on top" (see
https://westnordost.de/misc/parallel_parking_lane.p
On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 at 00:22, Tobias Zwick wrote:
>
> https://westnordost.de/misc/2or1lanes.jpg
>
> It is a residential road marked clearly for 2 lanes, so it seems obvious
> to tag it with lanes=2. But on the other hand, you'll notice that there
> are parking cars on the right side that effectiv
The way I understood the tagging guidelines was that if there was nobody
parked there, could you drive along the lane as usual. If you can't then I
wouldn't include it as lanes=* and only tag it as parking:lane. If you can
drive along it when vacant, but you can still legally park there then I'd
in
Hi all
Tonight I'm pleased to announce the start of voting for the tagging
proposal about pumps
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Pumping_proposal
A lot of comments lead us to an interesting tagging for pumps devices,
water wells and wind pumps. Thank you to anyone involved in
Vào lúc 06:17 2020-11-19, Tobias Zwick đã viết:
Hello all
First of all, in the past, we have explored many edge cases for the
lanes-tag in various discussions and I am happy that for the most part,
it seems to be quite well defined by now. However, there is one edge
case which is not uncommon
I'm not sure if your first case
(https://westnordost.de/misc/2or1lanes.jpg) should be mapped as parallel
parking at all or if it's illegal parking and should actually be
no_parking or no_stopping (maybe depends on the local legislation or
permanence of the situation)? I recently discussed a similar
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Wednesday, November 18th, 2020 at 11:34 PM, Brian M. Sperlongano
wrote:
> This was fascinating reading. I do agree that we ought to have a definition
> for what gets tagged natural=coastline, and I think it's fine if that
> definition has some subjectivity
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Wednesday, November 18th, 2020 at 5:04 PM, Christoph Hormann
wrote:
> > Eric H. Christensen via Tagging tagging@openstreetmap.org hat am 18.11.2020
> > 21:19 geschrieben:
>
> > [...]
>
> First: the matter has been discussed at length previously so i would ad
Hello all
First of all, in the past, we have explored many edge cases for the
lanes-tag in various discussions and I am happy that for the most part,
it seems to be quite well defined by now. However, there is one edge
case which is not uncommon at all but still unclear or awkward to tag.
Loo
Hi André
It's great to have such a discussion here as to move forward on power
routing.
Answers below
Le mer. 18 nov. 2020 à 02:38, André Pirard a
écrit :
>
> Haille François,
>
> Merci pour ta réponse.
> So, I was told that 7,5 GW rating by an ALEGrO engineer but I didn't see
> it on OSM. He d
11 matches
Mail list logo