‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On Wednesday, November 18th, 2020 at 5:04 PM, Christoph Hormann <o...@imagico.de> wrote:
> > Eric H. Christensen via Tagging tagging@openstreetmap.org hat am 18.11.2020 > > 21:19 geschrieben: > > > [...] > > First: the matter has been discussed at length previously so i would advise > anyone who wants to form an opinion on the matter to read up on past > discussion where essentially everything relevant has been said already. Most > relevant links: > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2020-July/054405.html > > and resulting discussion: > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2020-August/thread.html#54434 > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_Features/Coastline-River_transit_placement Whew, after reading all of those messages, my take-away is that it's mostly what the locals see the water as. > Third: > > While this is ultimately not relevant because the delineation of tags in OSM > should be based on verifiable criteria obviously i have never seen any map > that displays ocean water and inland waterbodies in differentiated form that > shows the Chesapeake Bay as inland water. > > Classical examples with differentiated rendering are TPC/ONC (caution: links > go to large images): Pilot maps don't usually have lines deliniating sections of water. Marine charts do, however. R, Eric _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
