sent from a phone
> On 15. Sep 2020, at 19:27, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
> wrote:
>
> Is it maybe more universal to map
> strictly objective parameters instead?
>
> It seems for me that mapping
> length, armrest in the middle and width
> would be both far more objective and
> potentially
sent from a phone
> On 15. Sep 2020, at 21:39, Mark Wagner wrote:
>
> Which one is "the" width of the road?
not only from year to year but also with the seasons...
Cheers Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.op
On Tue, 15 Sep 2020 10:09:17 +0200
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> on unpaved
> roads, measure the extent of the maximum width that vehicles actually
> use, on a medium to narrow part of the highway (i.e. do not add the
> smallest width to a long stretch of highway if it only occurs for a
> short pa
Is it maybe more universal to map
strictly objective parameters instead?
It seems for me that mapping
length, armrest in the middle and width
would be both far more objective and
potentially useful also for other purposes
10 Sep 2020, 20:10 by r...@technomancy.org:
> I asked about this ~1½ years
On 15.09.20 10:52, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Looking at width tag variants:
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=width
here are those with more than 1K uses
Please be careful with such a list. E.g. width:shoulder stems
from a user in Finland and from something that looks like an old
(un
I expect the "width" of a way to be the actual width of the object it
represents.
This obviously changes depending on the mapping style applied, e.g.
- if it's a highway with sidewalk and cycleway tags, it's the width of
all of it
- if it's just a road with footways mapped as separate ways ne
Sep 14, 2020, 20:34 by supap...@riseup.net:
>
> Hey all,
>
>
> again and again there are discussions about which parts of a street
> (sidewalks and cycle paths, parking lanes, carriageway) should be
> considered when determining the width of a street. There does not seem
> to
On Tue, 15 Sep 2020 at 10:34, Tobias Zwick wrote:
> I plan to soon implement a "What is the width of this road" quest in
> StreetComplete where the user can measure the width of the road using his
> or her smartphone (similar to the app Measure from Google [1]). The app
> will need to instruct th
Am Di., 15. Sept. 2020 um 10:34 Uhr schrieb Tobias Zwick :
> I was under the impression that the wiki already defined it like 2).
>
If it were like this it would be fortunate, because we already have nearly
1,9 million highways tagged with "width", and if we could reasonably expect
that these ar
Absolutely high time! Thank you for bringing this up.
I was under the impression that the wiki already defined it like 2). 1)
is not practical because parking lanes can be informal or can change
quickly, 3) is also not practical because sidewalks + additional
greenery/space between road and si
Am Mo., 14. Sept. 2020 um 20:37 Uhr schrieb Supaplex :
> again and again there are discussions about which parts of a street
> (sidewalks and cycle paths, parking lanes, carriageway) should be
> considered when determining the width of a street. There does not seem to
> be a consensus and therefor
11 matches
Mail list logo
