sent from a phone
> On 23. Sep 2019, at 16:19, Volker Schmidt wrote:
>
> Here in Italy you may dial a number that looks like a landline but is in
> reality a mobile number.
> I would very much prefer a list of numbers, and not have to do tricks like
> phone_1, phone_2 ... but also not to hav
Defecation is a landuse. The implied landcover would be landcover=shit
Mvg Peter Elderson
> Op 23 sep. 2019 om 18:38 heeft Bob Kerr via Tagging
> het volgende geschreven:
>
> Hi, I have a last draft for tagging open_defecation
>
> See
>
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features
Hi, I have a last draft for tagging open_defecation
See
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/landuse%3Dopen_defecation
However I came across landcover
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Landcover
landcover=open_defecation
Which I think is more appropriate because that is wha
On Mon, 23 Sep 2019 at 15:12, websi...@posteo.de wrote:
In my eyes even contact:website=* is not necessarily illogical as many
> websites provide means to get in contact with the POI.
>
Assuming you mean a contact form, as opposed to a web page giving phone
number,
e-mail address, and maybe phys
Distinction between landline and mobile is technical, and often not clear.
You cannot always distinguish mobile numbers form landline numbers by their
numbering scheme.
In the US here is no distinction as far as I am aware anyway.
Here in Italy you may dial a number that looks like a landline but i
As a heavy user of the contact:*=* scheme I do not see an advantage to
mark it as deprecated.
At least not as long as we do not have a proper way to tag multiple
kinds of phone numbers and are dealing with non-sense like phone_2=*,
phone_3=* etc automatically generated by the iD editor.
One frequ
On 23/09/2019 09:14, Volker Schmidt wrote:
every mapper can set his own, as you doe and I do, but this
means that a router has to second guess what people think is
standard use in different countries.
That is exactly how it works.
In general, tagging surface is
every mapper can set his own, as you doe and I do, but this means that a
> router has to second guess what people think is standard use in different
> countries.
>
> That is exactly how it works.
> In general, tagging surface is almost
> always good idea or at least nice to do.
>
But this very unsa
