Re: [Tagging] Rethinking Map Features

On 11/07/19 09:46, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: On Thu, 11 Jul 2019 at 08:20, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com > wrote: With the above additional qualification to de facto, 'In use' becomes a frequently used tag without any criticism. The difference between

Re: [Tagging] Rethinking Map Features

On Thu, 11 Jul 2019 at 08:20, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > > With the above additional qualification to de facto, 'In use' becomes a > frequently used tag without any criticism. > The difference between the two is historical, before or after the adoption > of the approval process. > It d

Re: [Tagging] Rethinking Map Features

On 10/07/19 20:06, marc marc wrote: Le 07.07.19 à 10:31, Joseph Eisenberg a écrit : the difference between "de facto" and "in use" is unclear at the moment. approved : a proposal was made and approved during the vote. no proposal has in the meantime depreciated this tag. de facto: a not-voted

Re: [Tagging] Rethinking Map Features

sent from a phone > On 10. Jul 2019, at 12:06, marc marc wrote: > > landuse=forest<>natural=wood" could probably be in this situation > since there is not a de facto tag to use to describe a forest but 2. actually those are both de-facto (if there wasn’t any voting), and their meaning is no

Re: [Tagging] Rethinking Map Features

Le 07.07.19 à 10:31, Joseph Eisenberg a écrit : > the difference between "de facto" and "in use" > is unclear at the moment. approved : a proposal was made and approved during the vote. no proposal has in the meantime depreciated this tag. de facto: a not-voted tag but whose important use and abs

Re: [Tagging] shop=window(s) incorrectly deprecated in favor of craft=window_construction ?

sent from a phone > On 10. Jul 2019, at 01:17, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Just as doors come in standard sizes, so too do windows. > > You can read the reasons why things come in standard sizes here > http://www.ausdesign.com.au/articles/article27.html the typical size of win