27 Apr 2019, 01:54 by dieterdre...@gmail.com:
> A few people continue to add unused tags and properties to feature
> definitions, e.g. looking at the page for tourism=guesthouse, which is quite
> long in the meantime, you can find "proposed" values with names like
> "fridge"
> "stove"
> "dryi
I agree. The wiki is a point of entry for inexperienced contributors and
should therefore document established practices rather than serve as a
way to make marginal ideas appear established.
That said, the subjectivity of what constitutes "established practices"
guarantees controversy...
On
A few people continue to add unused tags and properties to feature
definitions, e.g. looking at the page for tourism=guesthouse, which is
quite long in the meantime, you can find "proposed" values with names like
"fridge"
"stove"
"drying:room"
"dinner"
which all hardly reach a 2 digit number of usa
On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 02:06:27PM +0200, Tobias Zwick wrote:
> Even shorter, because if there are conflicting rules in the conditional, the
> last one is taken, says the wiki. (Not sure if this is really implemented in
> applications that work with that data though):
just wondering, does anyone
Hi everyone,
after some comments in which we found that there was a misunderstanding in the
definition, we rewrote partially it to be more clear, also with some images. So
we start a new vote phase, here the new link
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Landcover_Barren#Second_
On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 3:44 AM Richard Fairhurst wrote:
> On some of the larger American river navigations the lock structures are
> built right within the main river channel - such as this new $3bn (!) lock
> on the Ohio River: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olmsted_Locks_and_Dam - so
> similar c
On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 5:47 AM Mateusz Konieczny
wrote:
> 25 Apr 2019, 23:49 by 61sundow...@gmail.com:
>> Communities have drawn together to keep a bank, a supermarket and a garage
>> going locally. They have also drawn together to keep a doctor.
>> They don't draw together for a church.
>
> Dep
I now splited the table into two parts so you can see how the wiki will look like (not equal)Seehttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/baby_changing_tables#Tagging Original Message Subject: Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Baby changing tableFrom: Valor Naram To
sent from a phone
> On 26. Apr 2019, at 11:52, Michael Brandtner via Tagging
> wrote:
>
> I’m against the tag baby_changing_table. As I have already written,
> changing_table is unambiguous and the most common word for this thing. No
> need for such a long key.
I’m not insisting, but I be
sent from a phone
> On 26. Apr 2019, at 04:08, Joseph Eisenberg
> wrote:
>
> Then we would need to retag all of the other "camp_site=camp_pitch"
> objects
yes, my suggestion would be to retag all* 7000 camp_site=camp_pitch to a pitch
tag and keep the camp_site values that refer to camp_sit
I’m against the tag baby_changing_table. As I have already written,
changing_table is unambiguous and the most common word for this thing. No need
for such a long key.
Am Donnerstag, April 25, 2019, 10:52 PM schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer
:
sent from a phone
> On 22. Apr 2019, at 01:49, marc m
25 Apr 2019, 23:49 by 61sundow...@gmail.com:
>
> Communities have drawn together to keep a bank, a supermarket and a garage
> going locally. They have also drawn together to keep a doctor.
> They don't draw together for a church.
>
Depends on a community. The last one
certainly is not true for m
sent from a phone
> On 26. Apr 2019, at 07:06, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Flat topped area with sudden elevation, wider or longer than it is high
> but horizontal dimension less than 1.6 km.
or maybe 1.609344 kilometers? Seriously, if we use a definition based on
imperial units
On Friday 26 April 2019, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
> I have created 2 proposal pages for natural=mesa and natural=butte
>
> A mesa is defined as "A flat-topped elevated landform surrounded by
> cliffs". A mesa may also be known as a table or tableland, potrero or
> tepui. See http://en.wikipedia.org/
I think the whole problem cannot be solved in general as it depends from
case to case.
A nice example of where the clear distinction between "natural river"
and "artificial canal" is hard to tell is the river Altmühl: Its most
downstream part has been built into a canal, which later leaves the
"na
Volker Schmidt wrote:
> Going back to the original example, I would say, not only the lock but
> the entire cut, in particular way
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24335
> should be tagged as waterway=canal. This scheme applies to most river-lock
> arrangements, the "cuts" are nearly almost
16 matches
Mail list logo
