[Tagging] Appropriate tagging for Redbox vending machines

While looking to add appropriate "vending" tags into the name suggestion index project I came across a US based Redbox vending machine brand. I'm across the globe so not familiar with it personally, but reading the wikipedia page

Re: [Tagging] Clarification of fire_hydrant:diameter

Hi Viking, Good question, here is the situation in many French places. As Paul mentioned for British hydrants, it is now mandatory to put signs next to hydrants in French also. The roll out of such began in Paris : https://twitter.com/InfosReseaux/status/1061630374328131585 The displayed diameter

Re: [Tagging] Classification ( and symbols ) according to context ( relative importance, size, or other 'context' )

On Thu, 24 Jan 2019 at 15:49, Michael Patrick wrote: > Fundamentally, you are attempting to make a categorization of the > rankings in the distribution of counts ( population ) of some subset > of a domain. > Thanks Michael - fairly deep, but if I interpreted it correctly, it backs up what I was

Re: [Tagging] Forest parcel with other landcover (scrub, scree…): how to map?

On Thu, 24 Jan 2019 at 23:16, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > This is based on relative importance rather than on built-up area or > administrative size or population. > Replied in "size in osm (tag <> size of the polygone)" thread Thanks Graeme ___ Taggi

Re: [Tagging] size in osm (tag <> size of the polygone) (was: Forest parcel with other landcover (scrub, scree…): how to map?)

Replying to other thread here On Thu, 24 Jan 2019 at 23:16, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > place=hamlet, place=village, place=town, place=city. > > This is based on relative importance rather than on built-up area or > administrative size or population. > Which agrees with my argument - even if it'

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal – Approved – crossing:island=*

Hello everyone, The proposal https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Key:crossing:island has been approved with 24 votes in favour and 2 votes against (required 74% majority: 20 votes). I'm going to create and update the documentation by the end of this week and will address the q

Re: [Tagging] Clarification of fire_hydrant:diameter

On Thu, 24 Jan 2019 at 18:04, Viking wrote: > Hello, > as pointed out here [1], we need to clarify the meaning of > fire_hydrant:diameter=*. > [...] > Which diameter is instead reported on the signboard in other countries? In the UK, the yellow "H" sign indicates two numbers. Upper number is

[Tagging] Clarification of fire_hydrant:diameter

Hello, as pointed out here [1], we need to clarify the meaning of fire_hydrant:diameter=*. We need to know which was the original meaning of this tag, because we probably misunderstood it when we rewrote fire hydrant page. In Italy fire hydrant signboard doesn't report any diameter: the only dia

Re: [Tagging] Fwd: Re: Forest parcel with other landcover (scrub, scree…): how to map?

Jan 23, 2019, 11:36 PM by pla16...@gmail.com: > On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 22:17, Warin <> 61sundow...@gmail.com > > > wrote: > > >> let me just repeat that ... >> >> "In OSM meaning of word used as key frequently has nearly norelation >> with meaning of tag."

Re: [Tagging] Forest parcel with other landcover (scrub, scree…): how to map?

Jan 23, 2019, 9:44 PM by pla16...@gmail.com: > On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 19:40, Mateusz Konieczny <> matkoni...@tutanota.com > > > wrote: > >> >> >> >> Jan 23, 2019, 1:11 PM by >> pla16...@gmail.com >> >> : >> >>> On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at

Re: [Tagging] Drain vs ditch

Same here. Drains we don't have that much (almost none), but many many ditches of all sizes ('sloot') and canals of all sizes ('vaart', 'gracht', 'singel'). They carry and store water to and from the land: the whole system is designed to keep ground water levels fixed in dry times as well as wet ti

Re: [Tagging] Drain vs ditch

> > The question that still remains is: what does "small" and "large" mean? I daresay there is no way and no need to clarify the meanings of "small" and "large" for artificial waterways. We can leave this up to the user to decide on it. Even the definition of a steam as "you can jump over it" is n

Re: [Tagging] size in osm (tag <> size of the polygone) (was: Forest parcel with other landcover (scrub, scree…): how to map?)

> Supermarkets here please fork another subjet, it's very very fair away of the first one ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - building:soft_storey

Thank-you very much, Stefano: very nice job! I hope you don't mind: I made some very minor adjustements to the wording, but of course you can revert them if you do not agree... Cheers, Sergio On 2019-01-24 09:53, Stefano Maffulli wrote: > Hello folks, > > I put together a proposal page after

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - building:soft_storey

Hello folks, I put together a proposal page after our conversations on the list[1]. There doesn't seem to be a strong opinion in favor or against building:soft_storey as a key, and given that the key is already in use[2], I suggest we use it. The proposal page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.or

[Tagging] Drift // Re: Re: Forest parcel with other landcover (scrub, scree…): how to map?

Indeed, that's why it's common practice to advertise the drift by changing the subject line. ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] The actual use of the level tag

See the original page on the Karlsruher schema: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/House_numbers/Karlsruhe_Schema Am 23.01.2019 um 05:04 schrieb Eugene Alvin Villar: > On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 4:11 PM Simon Poole > wrote: > > [...] addr tags are for po

Re: [Tagging] Forest parcel with other landcover (scrub, scree…): how to map?

Thread drift is common. If your on any internet forums you get used to it. Much like a talk in the pub, can go anywhere while your off getting the next round in, On 24/01/19 18:22, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: On Thu, 24 Jan 2019 at 16:52, Marc Gemis > wrote: