I’d recommend tagging all retail buildings, including fast foot and
restaurants, with building=retail.
A building built for fast food can easily be converted to a sit-down,
full-service restaurant without any modifications to the building
structure. And a restaurant in a storefront building could t
Right! Especially on my island, New Guinea.
That’s why we need to check the height of saddles and peaks “by hand”, or
better yet by survey with GPS.
OSM is the right place for this data, and some map styles and database
users will find it useful to analyze data about mountain areas and peaks.
Fo
I don't see no issue in mapping prominence for those interested in.
Just to mention for the sake of the discussion that 'sufficiently accurate DEM'
doesn't exists globally.
Yves ___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetm
On Sun, Sep 23, 2018 at 9:29 PM Bill Ricker wrote:
> This all seems like highly specialized, technical data that is not of
> general interest, as no one but peak-baggers understand the technical
> definition. Many map users seeing this prominence=999m factoid would
> jump to the incorrect conclusi
On Mon, Sep 24, 2018, 7:52 AM Martin Koppenhoefer,
wrote:
> I’ve recently used building=fast_food_restaurant
> but it is not used very often yet.
>
Can you care to explain why building=retail is not enough detail? I would
think that a combination of building=retail + amenity=fast_food (whether o
On Mon, Sep 24, 2018, 9:29 AM Bill Ricker, wrote:
> Is the OSM primary DB the right repository for this?
> Have we accepted being the repository for everything that anyone wants to
> map?
> (I don't remember hearing a change from "no".)
>
If people are already mapping whether an amenity=fuel is
This all seems like highly specialized, technical data that is not of
general interest, as no one but peak-baggers understand the technical
definition. Many map users seeing this prominence=999m factoid would
jump to the incorrect conclusion that it was relative to where the
(lower of the) watershe
sent from a phone
> On 23. Sep 2018, at 17:13, John Willis wrote:
>
> Building=retail if it is a purpose-built building for selling stuff ( a chain
> restaurant, a McDonald's, etc), as it is purpose-built for retail.
I’ve recently used building=fast_food_restaurant
but it is not used very
On Sun, Sep 23, 2018 at 5:40 PM Joseph Eisenberg
wrote:
> Yes, “prominence” here is a technical term that has only a partially
> connection to the subjective “importance” of a peak.
>
> In general, all peaks with high topographic prominence are considered
> important by local people (if anyone l
CMF
BJ
G
On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 6:55 AM Joseph Eisenberg
wrote:
> Good idea. It would be nice if these stockpiles of materials could all be
> tagged in a similar way. Piles of sand could also be used for flood control
> (eg to fill sandbags), while minds gravel and rocks could be used to repair
Mf
Fly
Henry
H
Rhmmm
On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 6:38 AM Joseph Eisenberg
wrote:
> Thanks Kevin
> Yes, “prominence” here is a technical term that has only a partially
> connection to the subjective “importance” of a peak.
>
> In general, all peaks with high topographic prominence are considered
>
Good idea. It would be nice if these stockpiles of materials could all be
tagged in a similar way. Piles of sand could also be used for flood control
(eg to fill sandbags), while minds gravel and rocks could be used to repair
roads, dikes, and so on.
BTW, I believe the British English term is “dik
Thanks Kevin
Yes, “prominence” here is a technical term that has only a partially
connection to the subjective “importance” of a peak.
In general, all peaks with high topographic prominence are considered
important by local people (if anyone lives near them) and mountain
climbers, but some peaks w
On Sun, Sep 23, 2018 at 9:34 AM Michael Reichert wrote:
> (1) If you assume the earth to be a plane, just order the peaks by their
> elevation. It's so simple that I don't give the necessary SQL query
> here. If we used a prominence=* key, it would have to be the distance to
> the next higher peak
> On Sep 23, 2018, at 6:33 AM, Anton Klim wrote:
>
> not levee_repair?
Hmm - no one at that location repairs levees. It is a station just to store
blocks.
I just want it to be unambiguous.
Like the difference between car repair and car parking
Even then, levee_repair might be good enough
Building=retail if it is a purpose-built building for selling stuff ( a chain
restaurant, a McDonald's, etc), as it is purpose-built for retail.
If it is a rentable location in a mixed use building (shop spaces on the
bottom, apartments on the 2nd floor) we have no suitable building tag for the
Thanks - I added a small note about the tsunami elevation in the examples.
Javbw
> On Sep 23, 2018, at 9:14 PM, Daniele Santini wrote:
>
> Ok, I updated the existing proposal
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstree
Hi Joseph,
Am 23.09.18 um 02:00 schrieb Joseph Eisenberg:
> Elevation and prominence can both be calculated from SRTM data, eg by
> using Opentopomap tiles and finding the highest contour lines around a
> peak, and the lowest near a saddle.
>
> Prominence and elevation can be calculated by comput
Looks fine to me. Perhaps open an issue in the JOSM bugtracker?
On 23/09/2018 07:43, Warin wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> There is a past entry of
>
> lanes:bus:conditional=1 @ (Mo-Fr 06:00-10:00,15:00-19:00)
>
>
> That JOSM says is incorrect. There is a declared 2 lanes there on the way.
>
> What is wr
Oh, I think you found an error in the default speed limits document. I
will go through the table from A to Z within the next few days or even
today to correct this at places where the gross vehicle weight is meant
instead of the actual weight. I guess then
maxspeed:conditional=xx @ (weight > yy)
Ok, I updated the existing proposal (the link is the same,
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/assembly_point:purpose
) moving from assembly_point:purpose= to
assembly_point:=* .
Cheers,
Daniele
Message: 1
> Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2018 06:05:59 +0900
> From: John Willis
> To: "Tag
Hey there
Do you have suggestions what would be the appropriate building value for
a building constructed for gastronomic purposes only, such as a
restaurant/café/fast food/food courts etc?
In context of Europe, I am thinking of:
- inns/taverns (eating only) (de: "Gasthof"), for example in forest
22 matches
Mail list logo
