“tailor” sounds very much like a craft to me.
On the other hand, it’s hard to argue with 1 tagged objects.
>From the title of the issue, I assume that craft wasn’t being rendered before?
>Which might very well explain why everyone used shop to tag it…
From: James
Sent: Sunday, 18
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/pull/3126#issuecomment-373963431
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=shop%3Dtailor
10 000 uses
vs
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/craft=tailor#overview
5000
Should we support both or just one(if so which?)
___
I was one of the people who commented in favor of revitalizing the
proposal. I've been using shop=cannabis to tag shops in Alaska where,
despite the huge cost and burdensome laws regulating them, they are popping
up all over. Even my small town of 5000 people, Homer, Alaska, has one shop
open now a
Almost, but the Lord of the Manor still exists and will be the one who benefits
from mineral rights. Fracking for example.
Phil (trigpoint)
On 17 March 2018 12:36:36 GMT+00:00, Colin Smale wrote:
>I have to agree with Martin on this. A Manor was an estate, which
>typically had a big house wher
A Manor is not a building, it's an area of land. A Manor House is a building.
On 17 March 2018 19:40:31 CET, "José G Moya Y." wrote:
>There are structures which are "manors" and I would't tag as a castle.
>As
>an example, a Spanish "cortijo" is the center of a big (originally,
>feudal)
>estate t
There are structures which are "manors" and I would't tag as a castle. As
an example, a Spanish "cortijo" is the center of a big (originally, feudal)
estate that is metonymically called "cortijo", too.
The central building has a defensive purpose. Historians would say some
walled villages are shap
On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 5:17 AM, James wrote:
> well shop=cannabis is going to be needed in Canada in a couple months as
> it's going to become legal nation wide with goverment run shops July 1st.
>
Not to mention I know of a couple in Vancouver that have been open in plain
sight and not hiding
Hi Paul and everyone,
We decided to just get this ‘base’ tag done first. However, I could see
cannabis=yes/no or something being added to coffee shops that legally sell, and
maybe a full cannabis wiki-page if needed to differentiate different cannabis
related things (I think a few States now
On Saturday 17 March 2018, Volker Schmidt wrote:
>
> I would remove the part that requires a current administrative
> function.
>
>
> Please do not remove this. This is the wording that made me use the
> manor tag for the Venetian Villas, which have exactly this
> characteristic. I believe, but a
On Sat, 17 Mar 2018 12:51:26 +0100
Christoph Hormann wrote:
> I have mentioned this many times in different situations before: The
> purpose of the tag documentation on the wiki is to document actual
> use of tags. This derives from
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Any_tags_you_like. If
I have to agree with Martin on this. A Manor was an estate, which typically had
a big house where the feudal Lords lived, called the Manor House. The building
therefore cannot itself be a Manor, and any feudal function has long since
disappeared.
On 17 March 2018 13:17:27 CET, Volker Schmidt
On 17 March 2018 13:24:04 CET, Paul Allen wrote:
>On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 10:17 AM, James wrote:
>
> For example, Netherlands, where some coffee shops also sell
>cannabis (which may constitute the bulk of their business and be the
>main
>reason people use them).
Koffieshop is a euphemism for
On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 10:17 AM, James wrote:
> well shop=cannabis is going to be needed in Canada in a couple months as
> it's going to become legal nation wide with goverment run shops July 1st.
>
> The preposal looks good
>
For the US and Canada, yes. For some countries, not entirely applic
.
I would remove the part that requires a current administrative function.
Please do not remove this. This is the wording that made me use the manor
tag for the Venetian Villas, which have exactly this characteristic. I
believe, but am not sure, that the same applies to the UK manor houses .
sent from a phone
On 17. Mar 2018, at 12:28, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
>> I wouldn't read too much into the wiki here
>
> Well, given that humans are incapable of telepathy and nobody who used
> this tag bothered to reply Wiki remain as the best available source.
I agree that there is an iss
On Saturday 17 March 2018, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
>
> > I wouldn't read too much into the wiki here
>
> Well, given that humans are incapable of telepathy and nobody who
> used this tag bothered to reply Wiki remain as the best available
> source.
>
> Even if Wiki is terrible it is usually better
On Sat, 17 Mar 2018 10:27:10 +
Andy Townsend wrote:
> OSM doesn't really have deprecated tags
OSM has tags described as terrible idea that should not be used.
> I wouldn't read too much into the wiki here
Well, given that humans are incapable of telepathy and nobody who used
this tag bothe
On 17/03/2018 09:51, Daniel Koć wrote:
Since there was no response so far, may I propose to deprecate using
historic=manor and suggest on the wiki page to use only
historic=castle + castle_type=manor instead. The reasons:
OSM doesn't really have deprecated tags, except in special cases (for
well shop=cannabis is going to be needed in Canada in a couple months as
it's going to become legal nation wide with goverment run shops July 1st.
The preposal looks good
On Fri, Mar 16, 2018, 8:22 PM Michael Patrick, wrote:
> Here, Cliff :-)
> ( from https://lcb.wa.gov/records/frequently-reque
Since there was no response so far, may I propose to deprecate using
historic=manor and suggest on the wiki page to use only historic=castle
+ castle_type=manor instead. The reasons:
1. I can't see the difference in what both schemes try to symbolize.
2. There's a section on historic=manor wik
On Sat, 17 Mar 2018 08:44:10 +0100
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> tree is about species, not about age or height
I am not so sure. Specimen of the same species of plants growing in one
location may be a tree and not a tree in a different location.
For example Pinus Mungo growing in high mountain
sent from a phone
> On 16. Mar 2018, at 22:47, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
>
> I would not expect area where no plant is higher than 50 cm to be
> described as forest. I think that using "landcover=trees" would be
> misleading in this case.
tree is about species, not about age or height
Woul
22 matches
Mail list logo
