On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 1:35 AM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Should it be mapped at all?
Hi,
I don't think it should be mapped. I used to take part in it years ago
and I can tell you that the environments where UrbEx can be practiced
are so highly varied I can't think of any meaningful
On 09-Jan-18 08:51 AM, OSMDoudou wrote:
Hello,
I stumbled upon this place: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2994322059.
I initially thought Urbex would be the former name of the factory
("Exploitation de craie abandonée" = "abandoned clay exploitation" in
English), but it seems it rather stan
That's the question - are we?
If we're showing a spot on the map that you can go exploring potentially
hazardous, possibly out-of-bounds areas, then are we supporting the idea, &
if so, should we be? It's one thing to say "this is an abandoned factory",
but should we then be pointing out that peop
On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 6:31 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
> are we encouraging / supporting / recommending something because we map
> it?
>
Some seem to think so. Witness municipalities asking us to remove their
streets
from the map, public land managers asking us not to map certain trails, and
2018-01-08 23:12 GMT+01:00 Graeme Fitzpatrick :
> I don't know if OSM should be seen to be possibly supporting /
> recommending / encouraging it?
>
are we encouraging / supporting / recommending something because we map it?
Cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging
Are we talking about the PTv1 or the PTv2 schema here?
On 09/01/18 08:50, Fernando Trebien wrote:
Hello,
A user recently questioned me about adding members with role "forward"
to subway routes in my area. It is my understanding that, if the route
runs in a single direction, this is allowed and
On 9 January 2018 at 07:51, OSMDoudou <
19b350d2-b1b3-4edb-ad96-288ea1238...@gmx.com> wrote:
> Hello,
> I stumbled upon this place: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2994322059.
>
>From reading the Wiki article, in conjunction with the little I already
knew of the concept, it strikes me as a bo
Hello,
I stumbled upon this place: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2994322059.
I initially thought Urbex would be the former name of the factory
("Exploitation de craie abandonée" = "abandoned clay exploitation" in
English), but it seems it rather stands for "Urban Exploration":
https://en.wik
Hello,
A user recently questioned me about adding members with role "forward"
to subway routes in my area. It is my understanding that, if the route
runs in a single direction, this is allowed and desirable [1].
However, specific articles [2][3] on different types of railways seem
to suggest that
Hi Marc,
thanks for your help.
08.01.2018 at 18:59 marc wrote:
if enought ppl agree with it, create a wiki page with a one-line
proposal/rationale. see others AE for a template.
Do you mean at this page?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:Automated_edits_log
Silly question: What co
Hello,
Le 08. 01. 18 à 17:07, User Rebo a écrit :
> what do you think of renaming all *roof:slope:direction* to
> *roof:direction* as the first one is not an official tag and has the
> exact same meaning as the second.
it look like a good idea since both terms are synonymous and the
documented
Hello Taggers,
what do you think of renaming all *roof:slope:direction* to
*roof:direction* as the first one is not an official tag and has the
exact same meaning as the second.
Usage:
roof:direction -> 12 025
roof:slope:direction -> 7672
Discussion was here: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/
> Maybe there's a good middle ground: a kerb height ranking, in lieu of taking
> out a ruler and/or guessing a true kerb:height value.
> kerb:height=low/medium/high, with corresponding ranges in cm (0-3, 3-10, 10+).
That's actually very similar to mountable/semi-mountable/non-mountable
or wheelc
13 matches
Mail list logo
