Re: [Tagging] How to map public transport routes that start and end at the same place and overlap themselves?

2017-09-30 Thread Johnparis
a very misshapen figure 8. Neither far end of it > really serves as a terminal, but rather a prominent station, of which there > are several along every route. > > What's the best way to map something like this, where the beginning and end > are the same place, making it a one-way loo

Re: [Tagging] How to map public transport routes that start and end at the same place and overlap themselves?

2017-09-30 Thread Warin
On 01-Oct-17 01:31 PM, Albert Pundt wrote: I'm in Lancaster, PA right now and would like to add the Red Rose Transit bus lines to OSM. The network is made up of six "City" lines, serving destinations close to the city, and 11 "County" lines, which are radial rout

[Tagging] How to map public transport routes that start and end at the same place and overlap themselves?

2017-09-30 Thread Albert Pundt
I'm in Lancaster, PA right now and would like to add the Red Rose Transit bus lines to OSM. The network is made up of six "City" lines, serving destinations close to the city, and 11 "County" lines, which are radial routes to nearby towns with stops along the way. (A

Re: [Tagging] Fire hydrants split

2017-09-30 Thread Moritz
As nobody reacted on my last post on splitting it in a different way, just let us go for voting and see what will happen. Moritz ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Fire hydrants split

2017-09-30 Thread Walter Nordmann
Am 30.09.2017 um 19:24 schrieb Viking: According to the huge number of affected nodes (~300k for fire_hydrant:position=*). I'm afraid that a lot of voters will oppose the proposal due to the huge impact of it. In this case we would also not have the well discussed new tags and need to start a ne

Re: [Tagging] Fire hydrants split

2017-09-30 Thread Viking
> According to the huge number of affected nodes (~300k for > fire_hydrant:position=*). I'm afraid that a lot of voters will oppose > the proposal due to the huge impact of it. In this case we would also not > have the well > discussed new tags and need to start a new proposal. It seems we rea

Re: [Tagging] tagging two former church locations, with the same name but unrelated to each other

2017-09-30 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 30. Sep 2017, at 06:14, John F. Eldredge wrote: > > I have previously mapped the Mill Creek Baptist Church Graveyard, ID > 53498031, and would like to add a node for the location of the former church > building. I have seen this is tagged amenity=graveyard and landus

Re: [Tagging] tagging two former church locations, with the same name but unrelated to each other

2017-09-30 Thread John F. Eldredge
One location is in operation, one is no longer physically present or operating but has a historical marker, and one (the original location of the operating church) is missing and has no physical evidence, even a sign, at the site. On September 30, 2017 12:19:31 AM Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:

Re: [Tagging] Mapping hotels on buildings or areas around buildings

2017-09-30 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 30. Sep 2017, at 01:45, Neil Matthews wrote: > > Personally, I'd map the hotel as its building when it's clear -- since, I > would suggest that you can't actually "stay" in the grounds of a hotel -- you > stay in a room in a hotel building. Similarly, I'd add the addr