On Sat, Jun 3, 2017 at 3:06 PM, Colin Smale wrote:
> Hazmat normally refers to hazardous materials being carried as freight,
> not the fuel for the vehicle itself.
Campers carrying LPG or CNG are typically (near-universally) doing so for
"hotel" reasons (cooking, heating), and not propulsion.
On 3.6.2017 21:40, Paul Johnson wrote:
At least in the US, this would typically be hazmat=no
I don't think this is the same. The Wiki says that the hazmat=* tag
pertains to the material being transported, not to the fuel the vehicle
is using. The same holds for the traffic signs there, they'r
On 2017-06-03 21:40, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 3, 2017 at 1:17 PM, Michal Fabík wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> I'm sure this has been asked before, but I can't seem to find anything on
>> the topic in the Wiki. How do you tag access restriction for LPG/CNG-powered
>> cars, as is sometimes the case
On Sat, Jun 3, 2017 at 1:17 PM, Michal Fabík wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm sure this has been asked before, but I can't seem to find anything on
> the topic in the Wiki. How do you tag access restriction for
> LPG/CNG-powered cars, as is sometimes the case in underground garages.
> I'm thinking of something
On Sat, 2017-06-03 at 20:17 +0200, Michal Fabík wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm sure this has been asked before, but I can't seem to find
> anything
> on the topic in the Wiki. How do you tag access restriction for
> LPG/CNG-powered cars, as is sometimes the case in underground
> garages.
> I'm thinking of so
Hi,
I'm sure this has been asked before, but I can't seem to find anything
on the topic in the Wiki. How do you tag access restriction for
LPG/CNG-powered cars, as is sometimes the case in underground garages.
I'm thinking of something to the effect of:
motor_vehicle:conditional=no @ (fuel=lpg
On 6/2/2017 4:08 PM, Warin wrote:
At present I have;
hgv=yes/designated and
capacity:hgv=yes/number
Are there any others?
I am tempted to use both of the above tags - covers any future
preference. Thoughts?
The first would indicate that the parking is usable or designated for
truck par
using access tags on amenity=parking is common practice (mainly in a generic
fashion like access=customers), it could be hgv=designated, vehicle=no for a
truck only parking.
On the other hand, there is amenity =bicycle_parking and motorcycle_parking, so
truck_parking would be consistent as well
> On Jun 3, 2017, at 8:00 PM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> caravans
Campers/motorhomes are practically non-existent in Japan: They do exist, but
there is very little signage for them individually. Many campers are made from
_very_ small vans (smaller than a minivan) so they can be
On 03.06.2017 05:05, Warin wrote:
What to use tagging wise on areas presently tagged amenity=parking, name=Truck
Parking.
I think the name tag should be deleted. But I don't want to loose the information
"Truck parking" is the human-readable description, thus you can use the description=* tag
Javbw
> On Jun 3, 2017, at 8:00 PM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> capacity:disabled=no/yes/number
Yep, That is what I meant.
Although there is a need for labeling certain special individual spaces, I am
not talking about parking spaces individually in this thread.
service areas
On 03-Jun-17 06:17 PM, John Willis wrote:
Javbw
On Jun 3, 2017, at 8:08 AM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
hgv=yes/designated and
capacity:hgv=yes/number
For designating handicapped parking lots (which are often separate here in
Japan at large POIs) I have tagged them:
Amenity=park
Javbw
> On Jun 3, 2017, at 8:08 AM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> hgv=yes/designated and
>
> capacity:hgv=yes/number
For designating handicapped parking lots (which are often separate here in
Japan at large POIs) I have tagged them:
Amenity=parking
Access=no
Access:disabled=d
13 matches
Mail list logo
